> Sure, let's look at some facts and the devil in
> the detail which is completely being drowned out
I'd say you are ignoring the detail. I'd say you have ignored every counterpoint put to you and have not answered one question.
> Please verify the data for yourself. Note
> that you cannot resolve less than 25 Arc minutes
> (Let's say half a degree) with the bare eye.
Evidently that is incorrect.
> Robert Bauval's model suggests the following
> religious theme: When the celestial adze
> culminates, Osiris resurrects. This coincides
> with the maximum expansion of Ra (summer
> solstice). Then, Osiris recreates life at his
> summit and Horus is reborn. What does all this
> mean astronomically?
It means nothing. It is Bauval's whimsical tale with nothing to support it and still does not tell us which star was visible from the DP or shafts.
I find these ideas of the shafts being a conduit to launch a soul on a specific trajectory, just plain silly.
Since they insist on telling us the AE believed souls would fly to the heavens, would have been much easier for souls to look up and see their destination. Or were they also blind. After entering the shaft the soul was then zigzagged through it's path to the exterior of the pyramid only to find it hadn't gone far at all, hadn't even left Giza, and still had a tremendous distance to fly. Not much help those shafts.
This idea of the shafts being a conduit for souls is one of the more ridiculous ones.
> I get the following data (GPS Giza) which I just
> rechecked 10 minutes ago...let me say again, these
> are the altitude data I just obtained, not
> Bauval's data which he has of course published:
You did this with GPS? When did GPS become an astronomy tool for the past? You wouldn't be pulling my foot would you Manu?
> In the year 2450 B.C., Alnitak culminated at
> 45o 7'
> In the year 2450 B.C., Thuban culminated at
> 31o 58' and also traversed the Meridian
> at 28o 10'. The second datum is only
> relevant to those who think the D.P. was aiming
> for a star (I don't).
Then why, 2 days ago, did you say ...
You forget the alignments of the shafts which further narrow the possibilities since all four targets have to be in place at the same time for the shafts to aim at them.
1) King Chamber south shaft pointed to Alnitak
2) Queen Chamber south shaft pointed to Sirius
3) King Chamber north shaft pointed to Alpha Thuban
4) Queen Chamber north shaft pointed to Ursa minor at Kochab
Which is where Thanos came in to negate the shaft star alignment idea, making the conversation flow along a subject line.
> Now, once you have confirmed these data, I urge
> you to re-read your compadre' Thanos' replies to
> this topic and see how the details got swallowed
> in a sea of superficial and sophistic analysis and
> claims of fuzzy interpretations.
Thanos replied to your original post in a manner that followed the subject; shaft and DP alignment.
You have ignored all counterpoints put to you and have not answered one question.
You are being most uncooperative.
> Your job is to find another era which duplicates
> these alignments and then search for evidence of a
> sophisticated civilization which built the Great
> Pyramid. Good luck!
Why? Why would I want to find another era that duplicates alignments that no one can show existed and had no meaning for the pyramid builders?
Why would I want to spend time duplicating a foolish idea?
Ya know, as a professor you really suck. Drop the pretentious air Manu.
I think your job is to learn how to post in this forum. Like using the QUOTE function.