Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The angle defined by the 2:1 block ratio depends
> on the whether the blocks are have a true 1:1
> rise-over-run aspect ratio. And so I think there's
> also something to be said for the possibility that
> the angle was decided upon first, and then the the
> block ratios were calculated to make that angle
> happen.

Don't know. Looks interesting anyways.

> Meanwhile, I see far too many problems with the
> star alignment paradigm. Alway have. OCT always
> seemed to be doing damage control over a flood of
> misalignments and contradictions. I thought it was
> curious when Graham told Zahi that the entire
> alternative perspective depends on OCT (when Zahi
> stormed out of the building). In my opinion, there
> are plenty of more credible alternative hypotheses
> that have nothing to do with any star alignments.

I agree. I read the Orion Mystery when it first came out and found it compelling, but 25yrs later, the shaft component at least, has been largely if not thoroughly debunked on several levels. Which is unfortunate, but that is how the scientific method works. No point in continuing to put lipstick on a dead horse.

> But when someone decrees that this or that
> evidence is "irrelevant" (like the bends or the
> door-blocks at the upper terminus of the QC
> shafts) and tries to direct us instead to "what's
> important" without stating any basis for accepting
> such and such supporting evidence while rejecting
> or ignoring such and such contradictory evidence
> without presenting any basis for such a
> perspective, it's a pretty good clue that there's
> a non-objective ideology trying to navigate the
> agenda.

Agreed. Pure nonsense. To say the evidence of the internal architecture of the shafts have no bearing on the validity of the idea they were ever "star shafts", particularly when to consider such on any level clearly dispels the notion outright, peppered with with completely unwarranted and dishonest character assassination and paranoid histrionics no less, leaves little to the imagination the shaky ground in which such a belief stands.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 20-Feb-17 23:47 by Thanos5150.