cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you attempt to understand Giza out of
> context,
> > nonsense ensues. The evidence for that is all
> > around us.
>
> So why hasn't Egyptology figured out how any great
> pyramids were built and can't even bring
> themselves to differentiate between the real
> pyramids and the tiny little piles of rubble?




they differentiate between each and every Mastaba, Enclosure, Pyramid, Temple, etc etc. To say they do not is to utter an untruth

Why
> haven't they figured out the icons, symbols,
> scepters, or any details of the religion?


They have figured a great deal about this. The fact that you think not demonstrates your study regimen



>
> > When you state authoritatively that the AE
> could
> > NOT have built the yramids you are spreading
> > disinformation
>
> Nonsense. The "Egyptians" you believe in couldn't
> have constructed even a meal more complex than a
> dead rabbit.



The Egyptians I believe in distriuted food amongst the populace far more efficiently than we do today.


>
> > To do great things requires circumstance
> > inspiration and organisation. The people who
> > built the pyramids were obviously benefit of
> all
> > three.
>
> No! Absolutely not. G1 required knowledge,
> science, and the ability to do the work. Touchy/
> feely doesn't build anything but paradigms.

You do know the meaning of circumstance,. do you not?
And of Organisation?

Why can't you simply say you don't think they were inspired by their beliefs??



>
> > I'm actually shocked that you believe our
> > ancestors were incapable of finding the
> cardinal
> > points.
>
> They couldn't have found their stinky feet with
> both hands.
>


Sigh
> > I personally have no beliefs
>
> Good one. ;)


Strange comment. I have searched for the Divine all my Life.

Thank you for telling me I'm wasting my time.

PLease tell me you do not have grandchildren


Warwick