Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> If you attempt to understand Giza out of context,
> nonsense ensues. The evidence for that is all
> around us.

So why hasn't Egyptology figured out how any great pyramids were built and can't even bring themselves to differentiate between the real pyramids and the tiny little piles of rubble? Why haven't they figured out the icons, symbols, scepters, or any details of the religion?

> When you state authoritatively that the AE could
> NOT have built the yramids you are spreading
> disinformation

Nonsense. The "Egyptians" you believe in couldn't have constructed even a meal more complex than a dead rabbit.

> To do great things requires circumstance
> inspiration and organisation. The people who
> built the pyramids were obviously benefit of all
> three.

No! Absolutely not. G1 required knowledge, science, and the ability to do the work. Touchy/ feely doesn't build anything but paradigms.

> I'm actually shocked that you believe our
> ancestors were incapable of finding the cardinal
> points.

They couldn't have found their stinky feet with both hands.

> I personally have no beliefs

Good one. ;)