Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > So, you agree with Hassan, but you can’t
> spell
> > > his name?
> >
> > How does spelling his name have anything
> > whatsoever to do with whether I'm in agreement
> > with his opinion or not?
> > Never mind, we'll move on.
>
> What’s this? Asking a question and then
> deciding you don’t want the answer? This is
> writing, not speech: the thing to do if you
> don’t want an answer is not post the question.

Voice recognition software, therefore for me it's speech. As spoken.
Try it its very popular these days.
It also tends to have trouble with M&N.
Very telling isn't it.


>
> As I’m sure everyone else can see, it’s a
> simple but telling indication that you are not
> familiar with the author or his works.

As above..

>
> > > So, let’s have from you chapter and verse
> on
> > > “Hassam” claiming that the tablet is a
> modern
> > > fake.
> >
> > Where exactly did he say that the tablet "is a
> > modern fake"??
> > Or did you say that??
>
> No John, Femano said it:

Dr. Femano said that "it had been identified as a modern fake in an earlier discussion".

You then said to me... "So let's have from you chapter and verse on "Hassam" claiming that the tablet is a modern fake".

Where did I claim that it's a modern fake?
Furthermore why are you asking me for chapter and verse on Hassan claiming that it is a modern fake?
Very telling isn't it.


>
> “The bottom image was identified as a modern
> fake in an earlier discussion. The sphinx is a
> modern style, possibly Victorian, and not at all
> the style of 3rd millennium BC Egypt.”
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 87882,1088488#msg-1088488&v=t]http://grahamhancock
> .com/phorum/read.php?1,1087882,1088488#msg-1088488
> [/url]
>
> Did you not read before jumping in?
Maybe you need to do so.
>
> Then, in response to my request for clarification,
> he cited Hassan:
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 87882,1088537#msg-1088537&v=t]http://grahamhancock
> .com/phorum/read.php?1,1087882,1088537#msg-1088537
> [/url]

Which is not a claim that Hassam said that it was a fake.
He cited Hassan. Word for word.. No mention of fake.

I agree with Hassan. It is probably not a modern fake.
Do you have an expert opinion?
Exactly who first mentioned that Hassam stated that it was a modern fake?

Was It you Martyn?????????





> If you’re still not up to speed, I doubt I can
> help you.

I very much doubt that you can.........