Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > Warwick Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > > do you actually read what people write
> before you
> > > > jump down their throat?
> > > >
> > > > There is lots of circumstantial evidence
> > > > contemporary to the 4th dynasty
> > > >
> > > > There is none for your LC
> > > >
> > > > Quid pro quo
> > > >
> > > > Warwick
> > >
> > > Circumstantial evidence is merely suppporting
> > > evidence. It is not the smoking gun of
> > > "certainty".
> > >
> > > I've never claimed anything about a "Lost
> > > Civilization". That concept was invoked by
> others,
> > > not me.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, there is plenty of evidence that
> > those
> > > pyramids were not built by 3rd millennium BC
> > > Dynastics as defined by Egyptology and
> traditional
> > > thought.
> >
> > "...MERELY supporting evidence."
> >
> > Do you read what YOU write???
> >
> > cuz that's hilarious
> >
> >
> > Warwick
>
> I'm not surprised that you find that funny.
>
> Finding a dead body in a dumpster is "supporting
> evidence" to the claim that dumpsters were
> designed to be tombs, but it obviously doesn't
> provide any certainty that dumpsters were designed
> to be tombs.


so instead of dealing with the fact that there is some evidence that could lead one to conclude that it Might have been the 4th dynasty AE's who built them.....you change the subject to what they were designed to be.

so.....What do you think they were designed to be?

Warwick