Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Warwick Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > do you actually read what people write before you
> > > jump down their throat?
> > >
> > > There is lots of circumstantial evidence
> > > contemporary to the 4th dynasty
> > >
> > > There is none for your LC
> > >
> > > Quid pro quo
> > >
> > > Warwick
> >
> > Circumstantial evidence is merely suppporting
> > evidence. It is not the smoking gun of
> > "certainty".
> >
> > I've never claimed anything about a "Lost
> > Civilization". That concept was invoked by others,
> > not me.
> >
> > Meanwhile, there is plenty of evidence that those
> > pyramids were not built by 3rd millennium BC
> > Dynastics as defined by Egyptology and traditional
> > thought.
>
>
> "...MERELY supporting evidence."
>
> Do you read what YOU write???
>
>
> cuz that's hilarious
>
>
> Warwick
Is it time to remind him that there is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE for what honest people who call things by their names would identify as his “lost civilisation” claims?
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Warwick Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > do you actually read what people write before you
> > > jump down their throat?
> > >
> > > There is lots of circumstantial evidence
> > > contemporary to the 4th dynasty
> > >
> > > There is none for your LC
> > >
> > > Quid pro quo
> > >
> > > Warwick
> >
> > Circumstantial evidence is merely suppporting
> > evidence. It is not the smoking gun of
> > "certainty".
> >
> > I've never claimed anything about a "Lost
> > Civilization". That concept was invoked by others,
> > not me.
> >
> > Meanwhile, there is plenty of evidence that those
> > pyramids were not built by 3rd millennium BC
> > Dynastics as defined by Egyptology and traditional
> > thought.
>
>
> "...MERELY supporting evidence."
>
> Do you read what YOU write???
>
>
> cuz that's hilarious
>
>
> Warwick
Is it time to remind him that there is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE for what honest people who call things by their names would identify as his “lost civilisation” claims?
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.