Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Author: Audrey ()
Date: January 07, 2017 07:09AM
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If there was an ancient society, which was so
> intelligent, why do we not find their machinery?
> No tools, and no bodies uncovered. No prof, just
> conjecture. No written records. Nothing...
> Until that day, I will remain open minded, though
> not make that leap into the camp of "it must have
> been".
All of the drawings and ideas you've presented utilized "machinery" and "tools" and "bodies" that do not exist, have not been found, are lost to time or imagination. No remnant, no artifact, no written record, no proof, not one piece of your AE machinery remains to this day. So you have, in fact, leapt into the camp of "it must have been", making your viewpoint "just conjecture".
Priceless
And on top of that, you are totally unaware of the catastrophes Earth has been through. AND of the destructive power of those catastrophes. Evidently you are also unaware of the lifespan of steel, even without being subject to cosmic forces.
Just what we need, another mainstreamer who knows didley squat about the astronomical and geological history of Earth. Get with the times Steve, this is the 21st cent after all and new evidence has come to light.
AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH POTTERY AND WALL DECOR. There is science outside of Egyptology ya know.
Hi Audrey ,
I see you haven't changed any. Just as nasty as ever. Do you understand what being civil is?
>All of the drawings and ideas you've presented utilized "machinery" and "tools" and "bodies" that do not exist, have not been found, are lost to time or imagination. No remnant, no artifact, no written record, no proof, not one piece of your AE machinery remains to this day. So you have, in fact, leapt into the camp of "it must have been", making your viewpoint "just conjecture".
Yes Audrey, I stress the use of "simple machines", ie. Incline Plain (the causeway and face of the Pyramids), levers, and movable pulleys. As i doubt you even know what a simple machine is...what other machines are you talking about?
>making your viewpoint "just conjecture".
Very true. All my illustrations are just conjecture. How could they not be? They are constantly evolving, and only meant to be thought provoking. An attempt to show and explain a better way to build the Pyramids. It is defiantly "just conjecture".
I am guilty of some of those, same conclusions. Though, I don't "conclude" it is real.
Ref: [grahamhancock.com]
>not one piece of your AE machinery remains to this day. >No remnant, no artifact...
I would call chisels, ropes, boats and sleds remnants, to name a few. And, they are all in my illustrations.
>who knows didley squat about the astronomical and geological history of Earth.
>Get with the times Steve, this is the 21st cent after all and new evidence has come to light.
You just think you know. Yes Audrey, you are the all seeing eye... To show you just how crazy your beliefs are, back up this statement and tell us all,
Just what new evidence has come to light. I certainly want to "Get with the times and into 21st cent ".
What new evidence, and "cosmic forces"?

Date: January 07, 2017 07:09AM
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If there was an ancient society, which was so
> intelligent, why do we not find their machinery?
> No tools, and no bodies uncovered. No prof, just
> conjecture. No written records. Nothing...
> Until that day, I will remain open minded, though
> not make that leap into the camp of "it must have
> been".
All of the drawings and ideas you've presented utilized "machinery" and "tools" and "bodies" that do not exist, have not been found, are lost to time or imagination. No remnant, no artifact, no written record, no proof, not one piece of your AE machinery remains to this day. So you have, in fact, leapt into the camp of "it must have been", making your viewpoint "just conjecture".
Priceless
And on top of that, you are totally unaware of the catastrophes Earth has been through. AND of the destructive power of those catastrophes. Evidently you are also unaware of the lifespan of steel, even without being subject to cosmic forces.
Just what we need, another mainstreamer who knows didley squat about the astronomical and geological history of Earth. Get with the times Steve, this is the 21st cent after all and new evidence has come to light.
AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH POTTERY AND WALL DECOR. There is science outside of Egyptology ya know.
Hi Audrey ,
I see you haven't changed any. Just as nasty as ever. Do you understand what being civil is?
>All of the drawings and ideas you've presented utilized "machinery" and "tools" and "bodies" that do not exist, have not been found, are lost to time or imagination. No remnant, no artifact, no written record, no proof, not one piece of your AE machinery remains to this day. So you have, in fact, leapt into the camp of "it must have been", making your viewpoint "just conjecture".
Yes Audrey, I stress the use of "simple machines", ie. Incline Plain (the causeway and face of the Pyramids), levers, and movable pulleys. As i doubt you even know what a simple machine is...what other machines are you talking about?
>making your viewpoint "just conjecture".
Very true. All my illustrations are just conjecture. How could they not be? They are constantly evolving, and only meant to be thought provoking. An attempt to show and explain a better way to build the Pyramids. It is defiantly "just conjecture".
I am guilty of some of those, same conclusions. Though, I don't "conclude" it is real.
Ref: [grahamhancock.com]
>not one piece of your AE machinery remains to this day. >No remnant, no artifact...
I would call chisels, ropes, boats and sleds remnants, to name a few. And, they are all in my illustrations.
>who knows didley squat about the astronomical and geological history of Earth.
>Get with the times Steve, this is the 21st cent after all and new evidence has come to light.
You just think you know. Yes Audrey, you are the all seeing eye... To show you just how crazy your beliefs are, back up this statement and tell us all,
Just what new evidence has come to light. I certainly want to "Get with the times and into 21st cent ".
What new evidence, and "cosmic forces"?

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.