Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Were you to say simply that you are not convinced,
> > we could leave it at that. It’s the
> > “absolutely no reason” tells us that you are
> > lying (and stupidly so).
> >
> > You have shown yourself much
> > inclined to these absolutist claims, which look
> > much like the claims to certainty you impute to
> > others in a tone of complaint.
> >
> > M.
>
> I have no problem if you want to believe those
> conclusions.

Wanting has nothing to do with it. I am compelled to these conclusions by the evidence.

> I just consider the evidence to be replete
> with reasonable doubt.

So much for your epistemology.

> I see absolutely
> nothing convincing in the physical evidence that
> specifically confirms that any megalithic pyramid
> was built in the 3rd millennium BC. No artifact,
> painting, description, or even graffiti of any
> tools and methods from any of the many tens of
> thousands of workers, supervisors, and officials
> who were there, saw it happen, and participated in
> the construction, for over 200 years.

. . . says Femano, having weaselled his way around the ˤprw names and the Merer diary by way of the “Vyse forgery” and (his own contribution) the inanity I was addressing here:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1083792,1084261#msg-1084261

Attentive readers will note that Doctor Femano has provided no supporting evidence or argument for his “absolutely no reason to believe” claim, consistent with his record of producing NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of the civilisation to which he prefers to attribute the pyramids (and that really is a case of wanting to believe).

M.