Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OCaptain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thanos, it's no surprise that I respectfully
> > > disagree with you once again. In my opinion
> > there
> > > is indeed a growing body of evidence that's
> > making
> > > it even more tenuous that those cyclopean
> > > structures were built and designed by the 3rd
> > > millennium Dynastics to be tombs.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, you may choose to continue
> > deflecting
> > > with your predictable pedantics, but I'm
> > choosing
> > > to stick to the main point about the utter
> lack
> > of
> > > evidence of provenance and tombs, despite
> > > implications to the contrary in the OP.
> >
> >
> > So, you take it on faith....
>
> How did you draw that conclusion from my post? I
> thought I was clear that I took nothing on faith
> and, rather, depend primarily on physical
> evidence. If anything, mainstream seems to "take
> it on faith" that the early historians and
> explorers were correct in the conclusions they
> drew without feeling any urge to scrutinize such
> traditional thought by applying modern standards
> of proof.
Wrong. All of it.
Do better.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06-Jan-17 15:51 by OCaptain.
-------------------------------------------------------
> OCaptain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thanos, it's no surprise that I respectfully
> > > disagree with you once again. In my opinion
> > there
> > > is indeed a growing body of evidence that's
> > making
> > > it even more tenuous that those cyclopean
> > > structures were built and designed by the 3rd
> > > millennium Dynastics to be tombs.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, you may choose to continue
> > deflecting
> > > with your predictable pedantics, but I'm
> > choosing
> > > to stick to the main point about the utter
> lack
> > of
> > > evidence of provenance and tombs, despite
> > > implications to the contrary in the OP.
> >
> >
> > So, you take it on faith....
>
> How did you draw that conclusion from my post? I
> thought I was clear that I took nothing on faith
> and, rather, depend primarily on physical
> evidence. If anything, mainstream seems to "take
> it on faith" that the early historians and
> explorers were correct in the conclusions they
> drew without feeling any urge to scrutinize such
> traditional thought by applying modern standards
> of proof.
Wrong. All of it.
Do better.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06-Jan-17 15:51 by OCaptain.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.