Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
OCaptain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanos, it's no surprise that I respectfully
> > disagree with you once again. In my opinion
> there
> > is indeed a growing body of evidence that's
> making
> > it even more tenuous that those cyclopean
> > structures were built and designed by the 3rd
> > millennium Dynastics to be tombs.
> >
> > Meanwhile, you may choose to continue
> deflecting
> > with your predictable pedantics, but I'm
> choosing
> > to stick to the main point about the utter lack
> of
> > evidence of provenance and tombs, despite
> > implications to the contrary in the OP.
>
>
> So, you take it on faith....
How did you draw that conclusion from my post? I thought I was clear that I took nothing on faith and, rather, depend primarily on physical evidence. If anything, mainstream seems to "take it on faith" that the early historians and explorers were correct in the conclusions they drew without feeling any urge to scrutinize such traditional thought by applying modern standards of proof.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanos, it's no surprise that I respectfully
> > disagree with you once again. In my opinion
> there
> > is indeed a growing body of evidence that's
> making
> > it even more tenuous that those cyclopean
> > structures were built and designed by the 3rd
> > millennium Dynastics to be tombs.
> >
> > Meanwhile, you may choose to continue
> deflecting
> > with your predictable pedantics, but I'm
> choosing
> > to stick to the main point about the utter lack
> of
> > evidence of provenance and tombs, despite
> > implications to the contrary in the OP.
>
>
> So, you take it on faith....
How did you draw that conclusion from my post? I thought I was clear that I took nothing on faith and, rather, depend primarily on physical evidence. If anything, mainstream seems to "take it on faith" that the early historians and explorers were correct in the conclusions they drew without feeling any urge to scrutinize such traditional thought by applying modern standards of proof.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.