Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, its not the correct answer which would help if
> you first understood the question. This same exact
> thing has been discussed so many times yet you
> guys just don't want to accept reality. A culture
> capable of building such structures, like
> pyrmaids, would have left an enormous material
> culture footprint, like what is seen in the AE,
> that is completely independant of whether or not
> any of their "bones" were found.
We don't wish to accept your reality. And since you insist yours is the true reality, you will not be able to understand the evidence we present. What you consider to be reality, I see as fantasy.
Footprint? Yes, a huge footprint, it's called a pyramid. You're looking for pottery and wall paintings. Some look deeper, at the math required and incorporated into the pyramids. This is undeniable evidence, as are the engineering achievements. Of course these two facts are not as obvious as pottery and wall décor, but they do exist, if one is intelligent enough to recognize them. All that Egyptology has, all that they work with is pottery and wall décor. They simply will not consider anything else.
Math is the language of the universe. Why would they need to leave anything else? Maybe they were not appealing to the undeveloped intellect, and were not concerned with preserving pretty pots and paintings.
The answer to your question of where is the evidence for a LC, lies in your expectations of what that evidence would be. We cannot make the evidence conform to your expectations. You are convinced of evolution, of the impossibility that a society could evolve much higher than ours in the 4 billion year life of this planet. I find this absurd. It's the same as saying there can be no other intelligent life forms in the universe.
You seem to be operating from the premise that all that existed has been discovered and there are only a few minor details to fill in. I operate from the opposite, we have only a few minor details and all else has not been discovered.
BTW - calling people names and insulting every alt that replies to your posts will only alienate you and discourage posting to your threads.
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, its not the correct answer which would help if
> you first understood the question. This same exact
> thing has been discussed so many times yet you
> guys just don't want to accept reality. A culture
> capable of building such structures, like
> pyrmaids, would have left an enormous material
> culture footprint, like what is seen in the AE,
> that is completely independant of whether or not
> any of their "bones" were found.
We don't wish to accept your reality. And since you insist yours is the true reality, you will not be able to understand the evidence we present. What you consider to be reality, I see as fantasy.
Footprint? Yes, a huge footprint, it's called a pyramid. You're looking for pottery and wall paintings. Some look deeper, at the math required and incorporated into the pyramids. This is undeniable evidence, as are the engineering achievements. Of course these two facts are not as obvious as pottery and wall décor, but they do exist, if one is intelligent enough to recognize them. All that Egyptology has, all that they work with is pottery and wall décor. They simply will not consider anything else.
Math is the language of the universe. Why would they need to leave anything else? Maybe they were not appealing to the undeveloped intellect, and were not concerned with preserving pretty pots and paintings.
The answer to your question of where is the evidence for a LC, lies in your expectations of what that evidence would be. We cannot make the evidence conform to your expectations. You are convinced of evolution, of the impossibility that a society could evolve much higher than ours in the 4 billion year life of this planet. I find this absurd. It's the same as saying there can be no other intelligent life forms in the universe.
You seem to be operating from the premise that all that existed has been discovered and there are only a few minor details to fill in. I operate from the opposite, we have only a few minor details and all else has not been discovered.
BTW - calling people names and insulting every alt that replies to your posts will only alienate you and discourage posting to your threads.
He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.