Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
LonelyAngel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > LonelyAngel Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > Martin Stower Wrote:
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > You remind me of a Mr Unintended Self-Commentary I
> > > > used to know.
> > > >
> > > > M.
> > >
>
> > > And you, strangely enough, remind me of John
> > > Douglas, the 9th Marquis of Queensberry, a bully
> > > and a boar, who spent his last days driving
> > > himself daft that he was being pursued and
> > > surrounded by the "Oscar Wilders".
> >
> > The word you were looking for is “boor”.
> >
> > Good job you’re not a writer. You’d embarrass
> > yourself.
> >
> > > In your case, in Scott Creighton's absence from
> > > this board, you have decided that everyone who
> > > speaks up for his work is either he himself or
> > > part of his gang or brigade. The paranoia is
> > > ripping out of you. Cladking knows me from years
> > > back, yet on this board and on Jason the bloggers
> > > website you keep insinuating that I am either a
> > > sockpuppet or have multiple profiles - both
> > > totally 100% wrong. You even accused some guy
> > > called Peter or Robert of the same thing on here.
> >
> > Where to start?
> >
> > That you fail (yet again) to support your claims
> > with quotes and links is merely what we have come
> > to expect. Here (again) are the relevant links:
> >
> > http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-scott-creightons-the-great-pyramid-hoax-part-two
> >
> > http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/listen-to-me-on-the-archaeological-fantasies-podcast
> >
> > As I wrote last time,
> > readers may make up their own minds.
> >
> > “. . . everyone who speaks up for his work . . .”
> >
> > Which excludes you. You’re “withholding
> > judgement”, remember?—but then that was a lie
> > so transparent as to leave us with no reason to
> > believe anything you say.
> >
> > “. . . is either he himself or part of his gang
> > or brigade . . .”
> >
> > The words I used were “clique” and
> > “claque”.
> >
> > Who do you think you are kidding here? Have some
> > respect for the readers of this board. They’ve
> > seen the extent to which this is observably true.
> > As for the sock puppets, no one but Creighton
> > himself or his clones would go to the lengths that
> > you and “Peter Robertson” have. Remember
> > clones? Not so common, now. I mean fans who
> > copied their idols to an extent that it was hard
> > to tell them apart—but, in fairness to clones,
> > they were not usually such abject suck-ups as
> > Creighton attracts. Talk about stomach churning!
> >
> > Your behaviour would be healthier if you were
> > Creighton—and shouting about “paranoia” is
> > misdirection. Sock puppetry is real and
> > commonplace and everyone here knows it.
> >
> > “ . . . you keep insinuating that I . . . have multiple profiles . . .”
> >
> > Quote and link, please.
> >
> > “You even accused some guy called Peter or
> > Robert of the same thing on here.”
> >
> > Who do you think you are kidding? You know it’s
> > “Peter Robertson”, else why are you even
> > mentioning it?
> >
> > Would it be this you have in mind?
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1067713,1068420#msg-1068420
> >
> > Again it’s left to me to supply the link.
> > Readers will note that it was Origyptian brought
> > “Peter Robertson” into the discussion.
> >
> > Words of “Peter Robertson” (second Colavito
> > link above):
> >
> > “Still not twigged yet Martin?”
> >
> > A strange thing for Peter Robertson to say.
> > Shouldn’t he have protested indignantly that he
> > was Peter Robertson and no other?
> >
> > > Instead of embarrassing yourself like this, and
> > > discrediting any worthy points you do have on this
> > > subject with your appalling accusations against
> > > anyone who disagrees with you, why don't you wait
> > > till Robert Bauval returns to this forum (as he
> > > surely will) just before Scott's book is due out
> > > to present his own "new ideas and thinking" which
> > > surprise surprise contradict and discredit
> > > whatever it looks like Scott's book is saying?
> >
> > The paranoia is ripping out of you.
> >
> > > That way you won't be alone and seem so unhinged
> > > about the whole thing.
> >
> > Putting this as kindly as I can, you are in no
> > good position to give advice on this.
> >
> > > A good pointer to The Return of the Great Man will
> > > be Richard Fusniak appearing. Keep watching the
> > > skies.
> >
> > You remind me even more of Mr Unintended
> > Self-Commentary.
> >
> > M.
>
> And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call
> "psycological projection".

Oh, you’re a “psycologist” now? LOL!

> Why you think I am suddenly not "me" and some kind
> of sockpuppet after all these years is more down
> to your convenience than anything else - another
> sign of a panicked mind shutting down.

Reminder: you gave your Real Name as “John Smith” for all of those years. Only very recently did you tell us that you are not John Smith, but rather “Sean Hunter”:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1067713,1067782#msg-1067782

You give as your reason for concealment identity theft, but this happened in 2011, four years after you registered here.

And now you’re asking us to believe that you’ve been scrupulously honest about yourself?

As for myself, I never took the construct “LonelyAngel” seriously.

> In all the years (10) I've known him on the
> Internet, Scott Creighton has never backed down
> from an argument or deployed the kind of tactics
> that fill your twisted view of how to debate -
> sockpuppets and all - and I'm sure if he wanted to
> engage with you he would come back and do it
> himself.
>
> And - as usual - wipe the floor with you.

In his dreams, which seem strangely also to be yours.

Looks like “withholding judgement” has gone right out of the window!

> The sad fact that he - like quite a few others -
> doesn't bother with this forum anymore is probably
> less to do with him personally and more to do with
> the fact that the tone of debate from inflexible,
> angry orthodoxy defenders like yourself has become
> toxic and downright thuggish.

Funny how some people howl when they get back the merest taste of what they dish out.

While others will be howling with laughter at your eulogy to the saintly Creighton.

M.

Edited 2019-09-16 to simplify URL format.

Edited 2019-12-03 to reinstate URL format.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03-Dec-19 01:02 by Martin Stower.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 3202 loveritas 25-Sep-16 10:45
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 888 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:25
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 958 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 13:47
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 887 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:57
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 786 D-Archer 26-Sep-16 13:40
"The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 947 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:52
My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 978 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:54
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 947 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:52
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 777 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:37
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 872 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 19:36
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 856 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:42
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 819 Thanos5150 25-Sep-16 21:05
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 783 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:11
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 807 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 17:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 771 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 18:05
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 800 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:19
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 833 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 19:35
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 753 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:53
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 717 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:00
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 798 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 20:16
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 837 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:50
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 732 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:07
Right To Review. 733 DScribr 26-Sep-16 13:31
Re: Right To Review. 770 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:23
Re: Right To Review. 742 DScribr 27-Sep-16 03:34
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 838 R Avry Wilson 25-Sep-16 21:24
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 817 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 21:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 831 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 01:17
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 892 cladking 26-Sep-16 02:03
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 821 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 09:26
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 772 cladking 26-Sep-16 13:52
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 787 Martin Stower 30-Sep-16 00:06
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 802 cladking 30-Sep-16 01:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 806 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:21
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 633 cladking 26-Sep-16 15:04
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 770 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 13:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 762 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:12
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 765 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 21:36
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 702 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:43
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 737 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 01:40
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 834 cladking 25-Sep-16 21:49
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 805 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 22:07
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 757 cladking 25-Sep-16 22:18
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 829 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 22:45
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 838 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 10:31
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 723 Origyptian 26-Sep-16 15:29
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 835 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 15:44
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 801 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 13:13
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 860 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 18:11
Re: The New Inquisition 901 Thunderbird 26-Sep-16 20:35
Re: The New Inquisition 710 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:43
Re: The New Inquisition 670 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:24
Re: The New Inquisition 756 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 21:53
Re: The New Inquisition 785 cladking 26-Sep-16 23:27
Re: The New Inquisition 737 Thanos5150 26-Sep-16 23:31
Re: The New Inquisition 735 cladking 27-Sep-16 01:25
The old copy/paste trick....... 842 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:28
Re: The Conspiracy 703 Thunderbird 27-Sep-16 00:58
Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1218 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 17:01
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1016 eyeofhorus33 26-Sep-16 19:54
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 829 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 20:26
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 758 M. J. Thomas 26-Sep-16 20:20
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 771 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:31
Lover's premise 855 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:18
Re: Lover's premise 743 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:20
Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 853 DScribr 27-Sep-16 18:39
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 975 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 19:16
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! (I swear it!!!) 961 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:21
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 819 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 20:38
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 772 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:47
Oh Oh 859 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:20
Re: Oh Oh 700 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:25
Re: Oh Oh 833 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 22:26
Re: Oh Oh 736 drrayeye 27-Sep-16 06:33
You're Not On The Same Page 803 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:19
You've got a lot to learn 816 drrayeye 29-Sep-16 05:36
Re: You've got a lot to learn 841 Barbelo 29-Sep-16 07:04
Re: You've got a lot to learn 744 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:13
Re: You've got a lot to learn 774 DScribr 29-Sep-16 18:23
Re: You've got a lot to learn 690 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:58
Re: You've got a lot to learn 901 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:16
Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 739 cladking 27-Sep-16 04:10
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 827 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 06:02
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 747 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:23
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 798 cladking 27-Sep-16 15:14
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 742 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:11
Living in the dark ages. 722 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:00
Re: Living in the dark ages. 781 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 14:35
Re: Living in the dark ages. 786 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:51
Re: Living in the dark ages. 777 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 754 cladking 27-Sep-16 16:11
Re: Living in the dark ages. 737 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 734 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 21:36
Re: Living in the dark ages. 699 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 773 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:31
Re: Living in the dark ages. 737 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 874 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 16:54
Re: Living in the dark ages. 827 cladking 27-Sep-16 17:22
Re: Living in the dark ages. 741 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 18:02
Re: Living in the dark ages. 744 cladking 27-Sep-16 18:14
Oooohh... touchy 927 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 711 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 19:24
Re: Oooohh... touchy 927 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 817 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:08
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 588 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 786 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 716 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 22:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 856 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 09:43
Re: Oooohh... touchy 762 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 11:56
Re: Oooohh... touchy 775 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 13:44
Re: Oooohh... touchy 639 earllt 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Oooohh... touchy 675 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 742 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:19
Re: Oooohh... touchy 724 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 15:28
Re: Oooohh... touchy 847 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 20:18
Re: Oooohh... touchy 748 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 665 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 10:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 643 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:40
Re: Oooohh... touchy 680 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 11:26
Re: Oooohh... touchy 735 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 11:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 696 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 12:10
Re: Oooohh... touchy 745 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 12:45
Re: Oooohh... touchy 726 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:05
Re: Oooohh... touchy 713 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 718 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:42
Re: Oooohh... touchy 725 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:48
Re: Oooohh... touchy 646 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:55
Re: Oooohh... touchy 701 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 14:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 753 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 14:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 730 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 718 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 597 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 692 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 16:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 719 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Oooohh... touchy 704 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 18:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 721 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 18:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 722 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 19:02
Re: Oooohh... touchy 679 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 20:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 668 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 20:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 685 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 21:52
Re: Oooohh... touchy 971 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 22:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 779 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 10:29
Re: Oooohh... touchy 694 Morten 08-Oct-16 15:36
Re: Oooohh... touchy 636 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 727 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 887 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:01
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 623 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 20:14
Re: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 691 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:35
Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 635 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 21:03
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 761 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 21:50
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 655 LonelyAngel 09-Oct-16 09:22
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 697 Martin Stower 09-Oct-16 16:46
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 735 LonelyAngel 10-Oct-16 10:27
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 914 Martin Stower 10-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 608 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 13:32
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 720 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 16:54
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 658 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 16:59
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 727 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 17:36
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 657 randompHactor 11-Oct-16 17:38
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 677 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 18:10
The Three Stooges 831 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 19:52
Re: The Three Stooges 786 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 19:55
Re: The Three Stooges 850 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 23:02
Re: The Three Stooges 801 Luminescence 12-Oct-16 01:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 750 Thunderbird 06-Oct-16 17:59
Racing for the Cliffs. 781 cladking 06-Oct-16 14:10
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 666 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 674 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:39
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 740 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:41
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 797 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.