Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LonelyAngel Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > You remind me of a Mr Unintended
> Self-Commentary I
> > > used to know.
> > >
> > > M.
> >

> > And you, strangely enough, remind me of John
> > Douglas, the 9th Marquis of Queensberry, a
> bully
> > and a boar, who spent his last days driving
> > himself daft that he was being pursued and
> > surrounded by the "Oscar Wilders".
>
> The word you were looking for is “boor”.
>
> Good job you’re not a writer. You’d embarrass
> yourself.
>
> > In your case, in Scott Creighton's absence from
> > this board, you have decided that everyone who
> > speaks up for his work is either he himself or
> > part of his gang or brigade. The paranoia is
> > ripping out of you. Cladking knows me from
> years
> > back, yet on this board and on Jason the
> bloggers
> > website you keep insinuating that I am either a
> > sockpuppet or have multiple profiles - both
> > totally 100% wrong. You even accused some guy
> > called Peter or Robert of the same thing on
> here.
>
> Where to start?
>
> That you fail (yet again) to support your claims
> with quotes and links is merely what we have come
> to expect. Here (again) are the relevant links:
>
> [url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-s
> cott-creightons-the-great-pyramid-hoax-part-two]ht
> tp://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-scott-cr
> eightons-the-great-pyramid-hoax-part-two[/url]
>
> [url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/listen-to-m
> e-on-the-archaeological-fantasies-podcast]http://w
> ww.jasoncolavito.com/blog/listen-to-me-on-the-arch
> aeological-fantasies-podcast[/url]
>
> As I wrote
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 67713,1069447#msg-1069447&v=t]last time[/url],
> readers may make up their own minds.
>
> “. . . everyone who speaks up for his work . .
> .”
>
> Which excludes you. You’re “withholding
> judgement”, remember?—but then that was a lie
> so transparent as to leave us with no reason to
> believe anything you say.
>
> “. . . is either he himself or part of his gang
> or brigade . . .”
>
> The words I used were “clique” and
> “claque”.
>
> Who do you think you are kidding here? Have some
> respect for the readers of this board. They’ve
> seen the extent to which this is observably true.
> As for the sock puppets, no one but Creighton
> himself or his clones would go to the lengths that
> you and “Peter Robertson” have. Remember
> clones? Not so common, now. I mean fans who
> copied their idols to an extent that it was hard
> to tell them apart—but, in fairness to clones,
> they were not usually such abject suck-ups as
> Creighton attracts. Talk about stomach churning!
>
> Your behaviour would be healthier if you were
> Creighton—and shouting about “paranoia” is
> misdirection. Sock puppetry is real and
> commonplace and everyone here knows it.
>
> “ . . . you keep insinuating that I . . . have
> multiple profiles . . .”
>
> Quote and link, please.
>
> “You even accused some guy called Peter or
> Robert of the same thing on here.”
>
> Who do you think you are kidding? You know it’s
> “Peter Robertson”, else why are you even
> mentioning it?
>
> Would it be this you have in mind?
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 67713,1068420#msg-1068420&v=t]http://grahamhancock
> .com/phorum/read.php?1,1067713,1068420#msg-1068420
> [/url]
>
> Again it’s left to me to supply the link.
> Readers will note that it was Origyptian brought
> “Peter Robertson” into the discussion.
>
> Words of “Peter Robertson” (second Colavito
> link above):
>
> “Still not twigged yet Martin?”
>
> A strange thing for Peter Robertson to say.
> Shouldn’t he have protested indignantly that he
> was Peter Robertson and no other?
>
> > Instead of embarrassing yourself like this, and
> > discrediting any worthy points you do have on
> this
> > subject with your appalling accusations against
> > anyone who disagrees with you, why don't you
> wait
> > till Robert Bauval returns to this forum (as he
> > surely will) just before Scott's book is due
> out
> > to present his own "new ideas and thinking"
> which
> > surprise surprise contradict and discredit
> > whatever it looks like Scott's book is saying?
>
> The paranoia is ripping out of you.
>
> > That way you won't be alone and seem so
> unhinged
> > about the whole thing.
>
> Putting this as kindly as I can, you are in no
> good position to give advice on this.
>
> > A good pointer to The Return of the Great Man
> will
> > be Richard Fusniak appearing. Keep watching
> the
> > skies.
>
> You remind me even more of Mr Unintended
> Self-Commentary.
>
> M.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call "psycological projection".

Why you think I am suddenly not "me" and some kind of sockpuppet after all these years is more down to your convenience than anything else - another sign of a panicked mind shutting down.

In all the years (10) I've known him on the Internet, Scott Creighton has never backed down from an argument or deployed the kind of tactics that fill your twisted view of how to debate - sockpuppets and all - and I'm sure if he wanted to engage with you he would come back and do it himself.

And - as usual - wipe the floor with you.

The sad fact that he - like quite a few others - doesn't bother with this forum anymore is probably less to do with him personally and more to do with the fact that the tone of debate from inflexible, angry orthodoxy defenders like yourself has become toxic and downright thuggish.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 3303 loveritas 25-Sep-16 10:45
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 936 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:25
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 997 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 13:47
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 928 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:57
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 833 D-Archer 26-Sep-16 13:40
"The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 993 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:52
My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 1029 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:54
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 989 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:52
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 822 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:37
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 921 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 19:36
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 910 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:42
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 868 Thanos5150 25-Sep-16 21:05
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 826 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:11
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 849 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 17:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 812 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 18:05
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 848 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:19
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 873 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 19:35
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 794 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:53
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 756 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:00
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 864 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 20:16
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 900 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:50
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 791 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:07
Right To Review. 777 DScribr 26-Sep-16 13:31
Re: Right To Review. 813 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:23
Re: Right To Review. 782 DScribr 27-Sep-16 03:34
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 883 R Avry Wilson 25-Sep-16 21:24
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 865 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 21:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 884 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 01:17
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 934 cladking 26-Sep-16 02:03
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 860 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 09:26
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 811 cladking 26-Sep-16 13:52
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 829 Martin Stower 30-Sep-16 00:06
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 843 cladking 30-Sep-16 01:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 850 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:21
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 674 cladking 26-Sep-16 15:04
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 814 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 13:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 808 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:12
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 807 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 21:36
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 741 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:43
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 777 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 01:40
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 880 cladking 25-Sep-16 21:49
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 846 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 22:07
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 803 cladking 25-Sep-16 22:18
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 874 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 22:45
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 882 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 10:31
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 768 Origyptian 26-Sep-16 15:29
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 892 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 15:44
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 865 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 13:13
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 936 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 18:11
Re: The New Inquisition 946 Thunderbird 26-Sep-16 20:35
Re: The New Inquisition 757 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:43
Re: The New Inquisition 726 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:24
Re: The New Inquisition 801 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 21:53
Re: The New Inquisition 826 cladking 26-Sep-16 23:27
Re: The New Inquisition 781 Thanos5150 26-Sep-16 23:31
Re: The New Inquisition 776 cladking 27-Sep-16 01:25
The old copy/paste trick....... 884 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:28
Re: The Conspiracy 750 Thunderbird 27-Sep-16 00:58
Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1302 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 17:01
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1068 eyeofhorus33 26-Sep-16 19:54
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 886 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 20:26
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 803 M. J. Thomas 26-Sep-16 20:20
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 819 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:31
Lover's premise 903 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:18
Re: Lover's premise 781 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:20
Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 897 DScribr 27-Sep-16 18:39
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 1024 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 19:16
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! (I swear it!!!) 1010 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:21
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 865 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 20:38
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 823 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:47
Oh Oh 899 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:20
Re: Oh Oh 741 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:25
Re: Oh Oh 874 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 22:26
Re: Oh Oh 782 drrayeye 27-Sep-16 06:33
You're Not On The Same Page 853 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:19
You've got a lot to learn 892 drrayeye 29-Sep-16 05:36
Re: You've got a lot to learn 888 Barbelo 29-Sep-16 07:04
Re: You've got a lot to learn 793 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:13
Re: You've got a lot to learn 817 DScribr 29-Sep-16 18:23
Re: You've got a lot to learn 739 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:58
Re: You've got a lot to learn 951 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:16
Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 783 cladking 27-Sep-16 04:10
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 879 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 06:02
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 793 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:23
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 843 cladking 27-Sep-16 15:14
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 785 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:11
Living in the dark ages. 767 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:00
Re: Living in the dark ages. 823 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 14:35
Re: Living in the dark ages. 833 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:51
Re: Living in the dark ages. 832 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 800 cladking 27-Sep-16 16:11
Re: Living in the dark ages. 786 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 776 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 21:36
Re: Living in the dark ages. 743 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 819 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:31
Re: Living in the dark ages. 782 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 961 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 16:54
Re: Living in the dark ages. 869 cladking 27-Sep-16 17:22
Re: Living in the dark ages. 782 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 18:02
Re: Living in the dark ages. 786 cladking 27-Sep-16 18:14
Oooohh... touchy 1004 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 753 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 19:24
Re: Oooohh... touchy 973 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 866 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:08
Re: Oooohh... touchy 828 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 631 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 830 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 764 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 22:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 896 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 09:43
Re: Oooohh... touchy 810 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 11:56
Re: Oooohh... touchy 822 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 13:44
Re: Oooohh... touchy 684 earllt 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Oooohh... touchy 720 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:19
Re: Oooohh... touchy 767 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 15:28
Re: Oooohh... touchy 890 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 20:18
Re: Oooohh... touchy 788 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 706 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 10:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 683 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:40
Re: Oooohh... touchy 726 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 11:26
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 11:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 744 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 12:10
Re: Oooohh... touchy 783 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 12:45
Re: Oooohh... touchy 771 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:05
Re: Oooohh... touchy 759 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 781 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:42
Re: Oooohh... touchy 768 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:48
Re: Oooohh... touchy 688 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:55
Re: Oooohh... touchy 747 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 14:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 795 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 14:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 777 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 758 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 634 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 726 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 16:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 759 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Oooohh... touchy 737 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 18:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 758 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 18:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 755 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 19:02
Re: Oooohh... touchy 736 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 20:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 709 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 20:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 723 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 21:52
Re: Oooohh... touchy 1088 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 22:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 813 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 10:29
Re: Oooohh... touchy 733 Morten 08-Oct-16 15:36
Re: Oooohh... touchy 676 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 767 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 939 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:01
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 653 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 20:14
Re: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 728 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:35
Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 670 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 21:03
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 801 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 21:50
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 716 LonelyAngel 09-Oct-16 09:22
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 738 Martin Stower 09-Oct-16 16:46
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 776 LonelyAngel 10-Oct-16 10:27
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 951 Martin Stower 10-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 643 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 13:32
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 760 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 16:54
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 697 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 16:59
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 767 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 17:36
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 695 randompHactor 11-Oct-16 17:38
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 709 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 18:10
The Three Stooges 869 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 19:52
Re: The Three Stooges 821 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 19:55
Re: The Three Stooges 888 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 23:02
Re: The Three Stooges 836 Luminescence 12-Oct-16 01:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 Thunderbird 06-Oct-16 17:59
Racing for the Cliffs. 822 cladking 06-Oct-16 14:10
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 703 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 710 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:39
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 782 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:41
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 897 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.