Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LonelyAngel Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > You remind me of a Mr Unintended
> Self-Commentary I
> > > used to know.
> > >
> > > M.
> >

> > And you, strangely enough, remind me of John
> > Douglas, the 9th Marquis of Queensberry, a
> bully
> > and a boar, who spent his last days driving
> > himself daft that he was being pursued and
> > surrounded by the "Oscar Wilders".
>
> The word you were looking for is “boor”.
>
> Good job you’re not a writer. You’d embarrass
> yourself.
>
> > In your case, in Scott Creighton's absence from
> > this board, you have decided that everyone who
> > speaks up for his work is either he himself or
> > part of his gang or brigade. The paranoia is
> > ripping out of you. Cladking knows me from
> years
> > back, yet on this board and on Jason the
> bloggers
> > website you keep insinuating that I am either a
> > sockpuppet or have multiple profiles - both
> > totally 100% wrong. You even accused some guy
> > called Peter or Robert of the same thing on
> here.
>
> Where to start?
>
> That you fail (yet again) to support your claims
> with quotes and links is merely what we have come
> to expect. Here (again) are the relevant links:
>
> [url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-s
> cott-creightons-the-great-pyramid-hoax-part-two]ht
> tp://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-scott-cr
> eightons-the-great-pyramid-hoax-part-two[/url]
>
> [url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/listen-to-m
> e-on-the-archaeological-fantasies-podcast]http://w
> ww.jasoncolavito.com/blog/listen-to-me-on-the-arch
> aeological-fantasies-podcast[/url]
>
> As I wrote
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 67713,1069447#msg-1069447&v=t]last time[/url],
> readers may make up their own minds.
>
> “. . . everyone who speaks up for his work . .
> .”
>
> Which excludes you. You’re “withholding
> judgement”, remember?—but then that was a lie
> so transparent as to leave us with no reason to
> believe anything you say.
>
> “. . . is either he himself or part of his gang
> or brigade . . .”
>
> The words I used were “clique” and
> “claque”.
>
> Who do you think you are kidding here? Have some
> respect for the readers of this board. They’ve
> seen the extent to which this is observably true.
> As for the sock puppets, no one but Creighton
> himself or his clones would go to the lengths that
> you and “Peter Robertson” have. Remember
> clones? Not so common, now. I mean fans who
> copied their idols to an extent that it was hard
> to tell them apart—but, in fairness to clones,
> they were not usually such abject suck-ups as
> Creighton attracts. Talk about stomach churning!
>
> Your behaviour would be healthier if you were
> Creighton—and shouting about “paranoia” is
> misdirection. Sock puppetry is real and
> commonplace and everyone here knows it.
>
> “ . . . you keep insinuating that I . . . have
> multiple profiles . . .”
>
> Quote and link, please.
>
> “You even accused some guy called Peter or
> Robert of the same thing on here.”
>
> Who do you think you are kidding? You know it’s
> “Peter Robertson”, else why are you even
> mentioning it?
>
> Would it be this you have in mind?
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 67713,1068420#msg-1068420&v=t]http://grahamhancock
> .com/phorum/read.php?1,1067713,1068420#msg-1068420
> [/url]
>
> Again it’s left to me to supply the link.
> Readers will note that it was Origyptian brought
> “Peter Robertson” into the discussion.
>
> Words of “Peter Robertson” (second Colavito
> link above):
>
> “Still not twigged yet Martin?”
>
> A strange thing for Peter Robertson to say.
> Shouldn’t he have protested indignantly that he
> was Peter Robertson and no other?
>
> > Instead of embarrassing yourself like this, and
> > discrediting any worthy points you do have on
> this
> > subject with your appalling accusations against
> > anyone who disagrees with you, why don't you
> wait
> > till Robert Bauval returns to this forum (as he
> > surely will) just before Scott's book is due
> out
> > to present his own "new ideas and thinking"
> which
> > surprise surprise contradict and discredit
> > whatever it looks like Scott's book is saying?
>
> The paranoia is ripping out of you.
>
> > That way you won't be alone and seem so
> unhinged
> > about the whole thing.
>
> Putting this as kindly as I can, you are in no
> good position to give advice on this.
>
> > A good pointer to The Return of the Great Man
> will
> > be Richard Fusniak appearing. Keep watching
> the
> > skies.
>
> You remind me even more of Mr Unintended
> Self-Commentary.
>
> M.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call "psycological projection".

Why you think I am suddenly not "me" and some kind of sockpuppet after all these years is more down to your convenience than anything else - another sign of a panicked mind shutting down.

In all the years (10) I've known him on the Internet, Scott Creighton has never backed down from an argument or deployed the kind of tactics that fill your twisted view of how to debate - sockpuppets and all - and I'm sure if he wanted to engage with you he would come back and do it himself.

And - as usual - wipe the floor with you.

The sad fact that he - like quite a few others - doesn't bother with this forum anymore is probably less to do with him personally and more to do with the fact that the tone of debate from inflexible, angry orthodoxy defenders like yourself has become toxic and downright thuggish.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 3202 loveritas 25-Sep-16 10:45
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 887 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:25
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 958 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 13:47
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 886 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:57
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 786 D-Archer 26-Sep-16 13:40
"The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 946 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:52
My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 976 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:54
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 947 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:52
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 777 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:37
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 872 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 19:36
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 855 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:42
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 819 Thanos5150 25-Sep-16 21:05
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 783 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:11
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 807 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 17:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 770 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 18:05
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 800 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:19
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 832 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 19:35
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 752 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:53
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 716 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:00
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 798 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 20:16
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 834 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:50
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 732 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:07
Right To Review. 733 DScribr 26-Sep-16 13:31
Re: Right To Review. 769 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:23
Re: Right To Review. 742 DScribr 27-Sep-16 03:34
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 837 R Avry Wilson 25-Sep-16 21:24
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 817 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 21:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 830 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 01:17
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 890 cladking 26-Sep-16 02:03
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 819 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 09:26
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 770 cladking 26-Sep-16 13:52
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 786 Martin Stower 30-Sep-16 00:06
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 801 cladking 30-Sep-16 01:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 804 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:21
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 631 cladking 26-Sep-16 15:04
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 768 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 13:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 760 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:12
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 763 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 21:36
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 701 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:43
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 736 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 01:40
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 833 cladking 25-Sep-16 21:49
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 804 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 22:07
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 755 cladking 25-Sep-16 22:18
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 827 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 22:45
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 836 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 10:31
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 722 Origyptian 26-Sep-16 15:29
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 834 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 15:44
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 798 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 13:13
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 859 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 18:11
Re: The New Inquisition 899 Thunderbird 26-Sep-16 20:35
Re: The New Inquisition 708 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:43
Re: The New Inquisition 669 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:24
Re: The New Inquisition 754 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 21:53
Re: The New Inquisition 783 cladking 26-Sep-16 23:27
Re: The New Inquisition 735 Thanos5150 26-Sep-16 23:31
Re: The New Inquisition 733 cladking 27-Sep-16 01:25
The old copy/paste trick....... 841 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:28
Re: The Conspiracy 701 Thunderbird 27-Sep-16 00:58
Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1217 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 17:01
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1014 eyeofhorus33 26-Sep-16 19:54
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 827 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 20:26
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 756 M. J. Thomas 26-Sep-16 20:20
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 769 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:31
Lover's premise 854 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:18
Re: Lover's premise 741 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:20
Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 851 DScribr 27-Sep-16 18:39
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 974 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 19:16
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! (I swear it!!!) 960 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:21
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 818 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 20:38
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 771 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:47
Oh Oh 857 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:20
Re: Oh Oh 697 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:25
Re: Oh Oh 831 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 22:26
Re: Oh Oh 735 drrayeye 27-Sep-16 06:33
You're Not On The Same Page 802 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:19
You've got a lot to learn 815 drrayeye 29-Sep-16 05:36
Re: You've got a lot to learn 840 Barbelo 29-Sep-16 07:04
Re: You've got a lot to learn 742 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:13
Re: You've got a lot to learn 773 DScribr 29-Sep-16 18:23
Re: You've got a lot to learn 688 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:58
Re: You've got a lot to learn 899 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:16
Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 738 cladking 27-Sep-16 04:10
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 826 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 06:02
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 745 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:23
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 796 cladking 27-Sep-16 15:14
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 740 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:11
Living in the dark ages. 721 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:00
Re: Living in the dark ages. 780 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 14:35
Re: Living in the dark ages. 785 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:51
Re: Living in the dark ages. 775 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 753 cladking 27-Sep-16 16:11
Re: Living in the dark ages. 736 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 733 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 21:36
Re: Living in the dark ages. 697 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 772 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:31
Re: Living in the dark ages. 736 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 873 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 16:54
Re: Living in the dark ages. 825 cladking 27-Sep-16 17:22
Re: Living in the dark ages. 738 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 18:02
Re: Living in the dark ages. 741 cladking 27-Sep-16 18:14
Oooohh... touchy 924 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 710 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 19:24
Re: Oooohh... touchy 926 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 814 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:08
Re: Oooohh... touchy 784 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 586 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 714 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 22:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 854 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 09:43
Re: Oooohh... touchy 760 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 11:56
Re: Oooohh... touchy 773 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 13:44
Re: Oooohh... touchy 638 earllt 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Oooohh... touchy 674 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 741 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:19
Re: Oooohh... touchy 723 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 15:28
Re: Oooohh... touchy 845 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 20:18
Re: Oooohh... touchy 746 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 664 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 10:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 640 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:40
Re: Oooohh... touchy 678 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 11:26
Re: Oooohh... touchy 734 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 11:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 695 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 12:10
Re: Oooohh... touchy 743 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 12:45
Re: Oooohh... touchy 725 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:05
Re: Oooohh... touchy 712 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 716 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:42
Re: Oooohh... touchy 724 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:48
Re: Oooohh... touchy 645 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:55
Re: Oooohh... touchy 700 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 14:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 751 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 14:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 729 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 716 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 596 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 691 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 16:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 718 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Oooohh... touchy 702 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 18:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 720 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 18:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 721 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 19:02
Re: Oooohh... touchy 678 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 20:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 666 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 20:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 684 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 21:52
Re: Oooohh... touchy 967 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 22:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 777 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 10:29
Re: Oooohh... touchy 693 Morten 08-Oct-16 15:36
Re: Oooohh... touchy 635 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 726 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 885 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:01
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 621 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 20:14
Re: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 690 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:35
Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 634 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 21:03
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 757 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 21:50
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 653 LonelyAngel 09-Oct-16 09:22
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 695 Martin Stower 09-Oct-16 16:46
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 733 LonelyAngel 10-Oct-16 10:27
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 912 Martin Stower 10-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 607 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 13:32
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 718 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 16:54
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 656 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 16:59
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 725 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 17:36
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 655 randompHactor 11-Oct-16 17:38
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 676 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 18:10
The Three Stooges 829 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 19:52
Re: The Three Stooges 785 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 19:55
Re: The Three Stooges 849 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 23:02
Re: The Three Stooges 799 Luminescence 12-Oct-16 01:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 749 Thunderbird 06-Oct-16 17:59
Racing for the Cliffs. 779 cladking 06-Oct-16 14:10
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 665 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 672 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:39
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 738 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:41
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 795 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.