Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As is usual Coppens just about nailed it.
> This is
> > the type of discourse that most of the
> believers
> > (who call themselves skeptics) display.
> They're
> > on a crusade with wiki as their gallant steed
> and
> > what they think the alt said as their
> windmill.

>
> As usual you have no idea what you are talking
> about. Literally not a clue yet you offer your
> bafflingly ignorant opinions anyways.
>
> From Coppens' article
> The
> Great Pyramid: a course in project
> management
:
>
Quote

A Great Pyramid feasibility study relating
> to the quarrying of the stone was performed in
> 1978 by Technical Director Merle Booker of the
> Indiana Limestone Institute of America. Consisting
> of 33 quarries, the Institute is considered by
> many architects to be one of the world’s leading
> authorities on limestone. Using modern equipment,
> the study concludes: “Utilizing the entire
> Indiana Limestone industry’s facilities as they
> now stand [for 33 quarries], and figuring on
> tripling present average production, it would take
> approximately 27 years to quarry, fabricate and
> ship the total requirements.”
>
> Copy and pasted several years ago from a previous
> version of the Wikipedia Great Pyramid
> article that has since been edited out. How do I
> know? I wrote it. I e-mailed him about it, but
> curiously never got a response back nor did he
> change it or give me credit. Oh, well.
>
> In Robert Schoch's book, Forgotten
> Civilizations
(p15-16) he extensively rewrites
> in his own words point by point, in order no less,
> what I wrote and edited on the Wiki Great
> Sphinx page which is still mostly there in its
> original form. In Graham's latest work
> Magicians of the Gods (p208-212), though to
> his credit he takes the seed and expands on it, it
> is clear to me this same section of the Sphinx
> article was the muse for his train of thought
> further hinted at by the fact on the very next
> page he actually quotes a Wikipedia article
> on p213.
>
> What a maroon.


Hi Lee, just to add a bit of flavor: Several people-who purchased a book by B. Forrester and DH Childress- have complained that they copy/pasted several paragraphs, etc....Paracas Skulls was the subject matter.
(On site badarchaeology I'll try to find link.)


Cheers.

Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.


"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 3306 loveritas 25-Sep-16 10:45
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 937 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:25
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 998 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 13:47
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 930 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:57
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 834 D-Archer 26-Sep-16 13:40
"The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 995 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:52
My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 1032 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:54
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 990 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:52
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 824 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:37
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 923 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 19:36
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 911 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:42
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 869 Thanos5150 25-Sep-16 21:05
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 827 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:11
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 851 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 17:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 816 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 18:05
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 849 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:19
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 876 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 19:35
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 796 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:53
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 758 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:00
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 866 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 20:16
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 901 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:50
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 792 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:07
Right To Review. 779 DScribr 26-Sep-16 13:31
Re: Right To Review. 814 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:23
Re: Right To Review. 785 DScribr 27-Sep-16 03:34
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 885 R Avry Wilson 25-Sep-16 21:24
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 866 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 21:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 886 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 01:17
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 936 cladking 26-Sep-16 02:03
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 862 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 09:26
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 812 cladking 26-Sep-16 13:52
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 830 Martin Stower 30-Sep-16 00:06
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 845 cladking 30-Sep-16 01:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 852 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:21
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 676 cladking 26-Sep-16 15:04
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 816 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 13:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 808 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:12
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 809 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 21:36
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 743 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:43
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 779 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 01:40
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 880 cladking 25-Sep-16 21:49
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 848 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 22:07
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 804 cladking 25-Sep-16 22:18
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 876 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 22:45
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 883 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 10:31
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 770 Origyptian 26-Sep-16 15:29
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 893 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 15:44
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 868 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 13:13
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 938 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 18:11
Re: The New Inquisition 948 Thunderbird 26-Sep-16 20:35
Re: The New Inquisition 758 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:43
Re: The New Inquisition 728 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:24
Re: The New Inquisition 802 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 21:53
Re: The New Inquisition 828 cladking 26-Sep-16 23:27
Re: The New Inquisition 784 Thanos5150 26-Sep-16 23:31
Re: The New Inquisition 778 cladking 27-Sep-16 01:25
The old copy/paste trick....... 887 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:28
Re: The Conspiracy 753 Thunderbird 27-Sep-16 00:58
Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1304 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 17:01
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1070 eyeofhorus33 26-Sep-16 19:54
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 891 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 20:26
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 805 M. J. Thomas 26-Sep-16 20:20
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 821 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:31
Lover's premise 905 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:18
Re: Lover's premise 783 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:20
Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 899 DScribr 27-Sep-16 18:39
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 1026 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 19:16
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! (I swear it!!!) 1012 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:21
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 867 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 20:38
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 824 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:47
Oh Oh 902 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:20
Re: Oh Oh 743 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:25
Re: Oh Oh 876 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 22:26
Re: Oh Oh 785 drrayeye 27-Sep-16 06:33
You're Not On The Same Page 855 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:19
You've got a lot to learn 893 drrayeye 29-Sep-16 05:36
Re: You've got a lot to learn 889 Barbelo 29-Sep-16 07:04
Re: You've got a lot to learn 795 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:13
Re: You've got a lot to learn 819 DScribr 29-Sep-16 18:23
Re: You've got a lot to learn 740 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:58
Re: You've got a lot to learn 953 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:16
Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 784 cladking 27-Sep-16 04:10
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 881 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 06:02
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 795 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:23
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 845 cladking 27-Sep-16 15:14
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 787 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:11
Living in the dark ages. 770 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:00
Re: Living in the dark ages. 825 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 14:35
Re: Living in the dark ages. 835 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:51
Re: Living in the dark ages. 835 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 801 cladking 27-Sep-16 16:11
Re: Living in the dark ages. 787 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 779 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 21:36
Re: Living in the dark ages. 744 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 821 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:31
Re: Living in the dark ages. 783 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 964 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 16:54
Re: Living in the dark ages. 871 cladking 27-Sep-16 17:22
Re: Living in the dark ages. 784 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 18:02
Re: Living in the dark ages. 788 cladking 27-Sep-16 18:14
Oooohh... touchy 1008 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 754 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 19:24
Re: Oooohh... touchy 974 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 868 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:08
Re: Oooohh... touchy 829 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 633 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 831 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 766 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 22:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 898 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 09:43
Re: Oooohh... touchy 811 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 11:56
Re: Oooohh... touchy 824 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 13:44
Re: Oooohh... touchy 686 earllt 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Oooohh... touchy 723 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 787 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:19
Re: Oooohh... touchy 769 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 15:28
Re: Oooohh... touchy 892 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 20:18
Re: Oooohh... touchy 790 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 708 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 10:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 685 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:40
Re: Oooohh... touchy 728 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 11:26
Re: Oooohh... touchy 786 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 11:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 745 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 12:10
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 12:45
Re: Oooohh... touchy 773 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:05
Re: Oooohh... touchy 761 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:42
Re: Oooohh... touchy 769 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:48
Re: Oooohh... touchy 690 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:55
Re: Oooohh... touchy 747 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 14:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 797 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 14:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 780 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 759 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 635 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 727 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 16:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 759 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Oooohh... touchy 737 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 18:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 758 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 18:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 755 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 19:02
Re: Oooohh... touchy 737 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 20:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 710 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 20:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 724 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 21:52
Re: Oooohh... touchy 1090 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 22:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 815 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 10:29
Re: Oooohh... touchy 733 Morten 08-Oct-16 15:36
Re: Oooohh... touchy 676 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 767 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 940 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:01
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 654 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 20:14
Re: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 728 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:35
Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 671 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 21:03
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 801 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 21:50
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 717 LonelyAngel 09-Oct-16 09:22
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 739 Martin Stower 09-Oct-16 16:46
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 777 LonelyAngel 10-Oct-16 10:27
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 951 Martin Stower 10-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 643 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 13:32
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 761 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 16:54
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 699 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 16:59
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 767 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 17:36
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 696 randompHactor 11-Oct-16 17:38
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 711 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 18:10
The Three Stooges 870 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 19:52
Re: The Three Stooges 821 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 19:55
Re: The Three Stooges 889 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 23:02
Re: The Three Stooges 838 Luminescence 12-Oct-16 01:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 Thunderbird 06-Oct-16 17:59
Racing for the Cliffs. 823 cladking 06-Oct-16 14:10
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 704 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 712 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:39
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 782 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:41
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 897 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.