Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DScribr Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi Robin, and just about anyone can call
> > themselves a 'Brush-Stroke Expert', etc, on the
> > Web.
> >
> >
> > IMO, Jason Colavito IS a credible expert
> witness,
> > and he did a very good job on SC's last book.
>



> One way of putting it: I am not sure that Jason
> Colavito would not be a credible expert witness on
> the topic of fringe literature.
>


> Relevant to the notional jurisdiction:
>
> [url=https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file
> /0008/127358/Expert-Witness-Lessons-Nov-2007-PUBLI
> C-COPY-circulated-hard-copy.pdf]https://www.city.a
> c.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/127358/Expert-Wit
> ness-Lessons-Nov-2007-PUBLIC-COPY-circulated-hard-
> copy.pdf[/url]
>
> “Some very unusual topics are brought into
> litigation. In these circumstances, experts may be
> called to give evidence only once in a lifetime.
> It would not be sensible to look for a mechanism
> to bring people like this into the Register.”
>
> M.


Fair enough....my only criticism of him is he neglected Chapter 6. (Of course, every aspect of SC's 'evidence' he "presented" in this Chapter had already been Debunked several times, [by you esp.] on multiple forums.)

EDIT TO ADD: We have no reason to believe that Jason Colavito would not be a credible expert witness on the topic of fringe literature.

Interesting read, thanks. (Chances of Ori reading this?!?.......)


Regards, W




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28-Sep-16 00:40 by DScribr.