Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DScribr Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi Robin, and just about anyone can call
> > themselves a 'Brush-Stroke Expert', etc, on the
> > Web.
> >
> >
> > IMO, Jason Colavito IS a credible expert
> witness,
> > and he did a very good job on SC's last book.
>
> One way of putting it: I am not sure that Jason
> Colavito would not be a credible expert witness on
> the topic of fringe literature.
>
> Relevant to the notional jurisdiction:
>
> [url=https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file
> /0008/127358/Expert-Witness-Lessons-Nov-2007-PUBLI
> C-COPY-circulated-hard-copy.pdf]https://www.city.a
> c.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/127358/Expert-Wit
> ness-Lessons-Nov-2007-PUBLIC-COPY-circulated-hard-
> copy.pdf[/url]
>
> “Some very unusual topics are brought into
> litigation. In these circumstances, experts may be
> called to give evidence only once in a lifetime.
> It would not be sensible to look for a mechanism
> to bring people like this into the Register.”
>
> M.
Fair enough....my only criticism of him is he neglected Chapter 6. (Of course, every aspect of SC's 'evidence' he "presented" in this Chapter had already been Debunked several times, [by you esp.] on multiple forums.)
EDIT TO ADD: We have no reason to believe that Jason Colavito would not be a credible expert witness on the topic of fringe literature.
Interesting read, thanks. (Chances of Ori reading this?!?.......)
Regards, W
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28-Sep-16 00:40 by DScribr.
-------------------------------------------------------
> DScribr Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi Robin, and just about anyone can call
> > themselves a 'Brush-Stroke Expert', etc, on the
> > Web.
> >
> >
> > IMO, Jason Colavito IS a credible expert
> witness,
> > and he did a very good job on SC's last book.
>
> One way of putting it: I am not sure that Jason
> Colavito would not be a credible expert witness on
> the topic of fringe literature.
>
> Relevant to the notional jurisdiction:
>
> [url=https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file
> /0008/127358/Expert-Witness-Lessons-Nov-2007-PUBLI
> C-COPY-circulated-hard-copy.pdf]https://www.city.a
> c.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/127358/Expert-Wit
> ness-Lessons-Nov-2007-PUBLIC-COPY-circulated-hard-
> copy.pdf[/url]
>
> “Some very unusual topics are brought into
> litigation. In these circumstances, experts may be
> called to give evidence only once in a lifetime.
> It would not be sensible to look for a mechanism
> to bring people like this into the Register.”
>
> M.
Fair enough....my only criticism of him is he neglected Chapter 6. (Of course, every aspect of SC's 'evidence' he "presented" in this Chapter had already been Debunked several times, [by you esp.] on multiple forums.)
EDIT TO ADD: We have no reason to believe that Jason Colavito would not be a credible expert witness on the topic of fringe literature.
Interesting read, thanks. (Chances of Ori reading this?!?.......)
Regards, W
Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28-Sep-16 00:40 by DScribr.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.