The "hypothetical testimony" from Jason Colavito isn't hypothetical.
It's been cut and pasted from Colavito's critique of Creighton's book.
Word for word.
I've actually read it, as I would think, most contributors here have also done.
That's why you were asked what is Loveritas's premise?
He doesn't have one. He's just repeating Colavito's words.
Also, as you have been told, Colavito was never presented as an "expert witness". That's your false premise.
You would do well to actually read and digest people's posts before you come in with your irrelevant nonsense.