Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course the paradigm is counting the
> numbers of angels that can stand on the head of a
> pin and parsing the PT while in complete agreement
> that the ancients were superstitious and dragged
> tombs up ramps.


Compare to your other posts in the last 7 days:

1)
Quote

There are a lot of possibilities here but Egyptology has simply pronounced it a tomb dragged up ramps by changeless and superstitious bumpkins because this is easier than doing real science and running real tests on the pyramid. Besides the ancients only spoke gobbledty gook that can't be understood even after a century of intensive study so it's established fact they were superstitious. Since it's assumed they mustta used ramps it's established fact they were too primitive and backward to be building anything but tombs.

2)
Quote

I can smell somebody saying "cultural context" almost as soon and as strongly as "ramp".

3)
Quote

Even if Egyptologists did the science they'd suppress the results until they could explain them in terms of changeless superstitious bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps.

4)
Quote

Even considering there were no ramps is revolutionary and impossible to Egyptologists. Once ramps and tombs are removed from their perspective there is nothing at all left and no means of framing a discussion.

5)
Quote

They're so busy trying and failing to show stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps they have no time for real science.

6)
Quote

After dragging all those stones up the ramps they must-have had they mustta had stinky feet. And no one can be more stinky footed than modern people living in heated offices with shoes, socks, and tinea.

7)
Quote

Indeed if you point out that their "cultural context" is just gobbledty gook spewing forth from stinky footed bumpkins they are also insulted for the culture they invented.

8)
Quote

Even with evidence and logic I can't win an argument because everyone knows the stinky footed bumpkins could only have used ramps.

9)
Quote

Sure they can use all sorts of weasel words and et als when they write rather than ever making an actual statement but when it comes to stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps these are set in stone....

There are never any et als to say the pyramids were tombs and they don't need no stinkin' evidence to to state categorically that they mustta been dragged up ramps....

Afterall it's only logical that once a stinky footed bumpkin, always a stinky footed bumpkin.

10)
Quote

Let me answer that question for the 1000th time; it's because every single thing in the paradigm is founded on the four assumptions that the great ptyramids are tombs dragged up ramps by superstitious and changeless people....

They can't because they can only tell us what is in the database and it's built on quicksand. It's built by individuals who can't even get a degree in the field unless they believe in tombs, ramps, and superstition....

11)
Quote

They believe that the builders were superstitious....It's not really possible they'd remove large amounts of earth from the base of G2 and then fill the created void with ramping material. Doubly so since ramps are debunked.

12)
Quote

The great pyramid builders were gobbledty gook spouting stinky footed bumpkins who dragged tombs up ramps and never changed.

This is just the last 7 days.

Lets break it down one step further:
1)...parsing the PT while in complete agreement that the ancients were superstitious and dragged tombs up ramps.
2)...tomb dragged up ramps by changeless and superstitious bumpkins....
3)...superstitious...mustta used ramps...anything but tombs.
4)...changeless superstitious bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps.
5)...ramps and tombs...
6)...stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps....
7)...dragging all those stones up the ramps...mustta had stinky feet.
8)...stinky footed bumpkins...
9)...stinky footed bumpkins could only have used ramps.
10)...stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps...mustta been dragged up ramps....stinky footed bumpkin....
11)...tombs dragged up ramps by superstitious and changeless people...tombs, ramps, and superstition....
12)...superstitious...ramps are debunked.
13)...stinky footed bumpkins who dragged tombs up ramps and never changed.

And this is just the last 7 days. Which says nothing of your equally repetitive hobby horsing nonsense day after day about evil Egyptology and how they never do real science et al.

And you all think the reason why the "establishment" could care less what you buffoons say on an internet forum or bush-league books is really because they are "threatened" that your "revolutionary ideas" based on no scholarship and complete and utter self-absorbed delusional BS is because they are "afraid" it might somehow overturn "established paradigms"??? Lol. Get a good nights sleep because I can promise you this is not the reason.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 3265 loveritas 25-Sep-16 10:45
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 916 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:25
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 981 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 13:47
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 913 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:57
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 810 D-Archer 26-Sep-16 13:40
"The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 977 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:52
My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 1010 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:54
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 972 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:52
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 806 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:37
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 898 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 19:36
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 884 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:42
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 852 Thanos5150 25-Sep-16 21:05
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 808 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:11
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 831 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 17:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 797 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 18:05
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 825 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:19
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 858 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 19:35
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 778 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:53
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 741 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:00
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 845 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 20:16
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 871 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:50
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 767 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:07
Right To Review. 760 DScribr 26-Sep-16 13:31
Re: Right To Review. 796 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:23
Re: Right To Review. 767 DScribr 27-Sep-16 03:34
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 864 R Avry Wilson 25-Sep-16 21:24
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 841 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 21:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 866 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 01:17
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 919 cladking 26-Sep-16 02:03
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 847 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 09:26
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 797 cladking 26-Sep-16 13:52
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 815 Martin Stower 30-Sep-16 00:06
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 830 cladking 30-Sep-16 01:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 833 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:21
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 658 cladking 26-Sep-16 15:04
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 799 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 13:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 788 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:12
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 790 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 21:36
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 727 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:43
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 760 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 01:40
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 860 cladking 25-Sep-16 21:49
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 832 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 22:07
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 782 cladking 25-Sep-16 22:18
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 855 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 22:45
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 862 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 10:31
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 753 Origyptian 26-Sep-16 15:29
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 865 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 15:44
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 832 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 13:13
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 907 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 18:11
Re: The New Inquisition 929 Thunderbird 26-Sep-16 20:35
Re: The New Inquisition 737 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:43
Re: The New Inquisition 698 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:24
Re: The New Inquisition 782 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 21:53
Re: The New Inquisition 810 cladking 26-Sep-16 23:27
Re: The New Inquisition 763 Thanos5150 26-Sep-16 23:31
Re: The New Inquisition 759 cladking 27-Sep-16 01:25
The old copy/paste trick....... 868 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:28
Re: The Conspiracy 731 Thunderbird 27-Sep-16 00:58
Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1272 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 17:01
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1049 eyeofhorus33 26-Sep-16 19:54
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 856 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 20:26
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 786 M. J. Thomas 26-Sep-16 20:20
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 798 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:31
Lover's premise 885 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:18
Re: Lover's premise 768 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:20
Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 882 DScribr 27-Sep-16 18:39
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 1004 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 19:16
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! (I swear it!!!) 989 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:21
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 845 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 20:38
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 800 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:47
Oh Oh 884 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:20
Re: Oh Oh 725 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:25
Re: Oh Oh 857 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 22:26
Re: Oh Oh 763 drrayeye 27-Sep-16 06:33
You're Not On The Same Page 835 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:19
You've got a lot to learn 859 drrayeye 29-Sep-16 05:36
Re: You've got a lot to learn 870 Barbelo 29-Sep-16 07:04
Re: You've got a lot to learn 769 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:13
Re: You've got a lot to learn 803 DScribr 29-Sep-16 18:23
Re: You've got a lot to learn 715 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:58
Re: You've got a lot to learn 933 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:16
Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 766 cladking 27-Sep-16 04:10
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 860 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 06:02
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 772 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:23
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 826 cladking 27-Sep-16 15:14
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 768 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:11
Living in the dark ages. 752 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:00
Re: Living in the dark ages. 808 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 14:35
Re: Living in the dark ages. 815 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:51
Re: Living in the dark ages. 814 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 783 cladking 27-Sep-16 16:11
Re: Living in the dark ages. 763 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 759 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 21:36
Re: Living in the dark ages. 725 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 803 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:31
Re: Living in the dark ages. 765 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 923 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 16:54
Re: Living in the dark ages. 852 cladking 27-Sep-16 17:22
Re: Living in the dark ages. 767 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 18:02
Re: Living in the dark ages. 770 cladking 27-Sep-16 18:14
Oooohh... touchy 979 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 737 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 19:24
Re: Oooohh... touchy 959 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 845 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:08
Re: Oooohh... touchy 811 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 614 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 812 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 739 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 22:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 881 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 09:43
Re: Oooohh... touchy 795 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 11:56
Re: Oooohh... touchy 804 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 13:44
Re: Oooohh... touchy 666 earllt 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Oooohh... touchy 704 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 769 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:19
Re: Oooohh... touchy 752 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 15:28
Re: Oooohh... touchy 873 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 20:18
Re: Oooohh... touchy 774 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 690 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 10:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 670 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:40
Re: Oooohh... touchy 707 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 11:26
Re: Oooohh... touchy 762 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 11:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 725 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 12:10
Re: Oooohh... touchy 769 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 12:45
Re: Oooohh... touchy 753 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:05
Re: Oooohh... touchy 741 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 751 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:42
Re: Oooohh... touchy 751 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:48
Re: Oooohh... touchy 671 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:55
Re: Oooohh... touchy 727 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 14:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 778 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 14:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 758 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 741 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 619 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 713 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 16:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 745 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Oooohh... touchy 726 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 18:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 748 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 18:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 743 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 19:02
Re: Oooohh... touchy 718 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 20:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 695 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 20:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 710 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 21:52
Re: Oooohh... touchy 1059 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 22:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 802 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 10:29
Re: Oooohh... touchy 720 Morten 08-Oct-16 15:36
Re: Oooohh... touchy 662 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 748 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 916 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:01
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 643 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 20:14
Re: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 716 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:35
Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 657 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 21:03
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 790 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 21:50
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 693 LonelyAngel 09-Oct-16 09:22
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 721 Martin Stower 09-Oct-16 16:46
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 759 LonelyAngel 10-Oct-16 10:27
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 938 Martin Stower 10-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 631 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 13:32
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 745 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 16:54
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 679 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 16:59
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 754 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 17:36
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 679 randompHactor 11-Oct-16 17:38
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 697 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 18:10
The Three Stooges 853 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 19:52
Re: The Three Stooges 810 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 19:55
Re: The Three Stooges 874 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 23:02
Re: The Three Stooges 822 Luminescence 12-Oct-16 01:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 773 Thunderbird 06-Oct-16 17:59
Racing for the Cliffs. 804 cladking 06-Oct-16 14:10
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 690 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 698 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:39
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 768 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:41
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 859 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.