Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course the paradigm is counting the
> numbers of angels that can stand on the head of a
> pin and parsing the PT while in complete agreement
> that the ancients were superstitious and dragged
> tombs up ramps.


Compare to your other posts in the last 7 days:

1)
Quote

There are a lot of possibilities here but Egyptology has simply pronounced it a tomb dragged up ramps by changeless and superstitious bumpkins because this is easier than doing real science and running real tests on the pyramid. Besides the ancients only spoke gobbledty gook that can't be understood even after a century of intensive study so it's established fact they were superstitious. Since it's assumed they mustta used ramps it's established fact they were too primitive and backward to be building anything but tombs.

2)
Quote

I can smell somebody saying "cultural context" almost as soon and as strongly as "ramp".

3)
Quote

Even if Egyptologists did the science they'd suppress the results until they could explain them in terms of changeless superstitious bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps.

4)
Quote

Even considering there were no ramps is revolutionary and impossible to Egyptologists. Once ramps and tombs are removed from their perspective there is nothing at all left and no means of framing a discussion.

5)
Quote

They're so busy trying and failing to show stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps they have no time for real science.

6)
Quote

After dragging all those stones up the ramps they must-have had they mustta had stinky feet. And no one can be more stinky footed than modern people living in heated offices with shoes, socks, and tinea.

7)
Quote

Indeed if you point out that their "cultural context" is just gobbledty gook spewing forth from stinky footed bumpkins they are also insulted for the culture they invented.

8)
Quote

Even with evidence and logic I can't win an argument because everyone knows the stinky footed bumpkins could only have used ramps.

9)
Quote

Sure they can use all sorts of weasel words and et als when they write rather than ever making an actual statement but when it comes to stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps these are set in stone....

There are never any et als to say the pyramids were tombs and they don't need no stinkin' evidence to to state categorically that they mustta been dragged up ramps....

Afterall it's only logical that once a stinky footed bumpkin, always a stinky footed bumpkin.

10)
Quote

Let me answer that question for the 1000th time; it's because every single thing in the paradigm is founded on the four assumptions that the great ptyramids are tombs dragged up ramps by superstitious and changeless people....

They can't because they can only tell us what is in the database and it's built on quicksand. It's built by individuals who can't even get a degree in the field unless they believe in tombs, ramps, and superstition....

11)
Quote

They believe that the builders were superstitious....It's not really possible they'd remove large amounts of earth from the base of G2 and then fill the created void with ramping material. Doubly so since ramps are debunked.

12)
Quote

The great pyramid builders were gobbledty gook spouting stinky footed bumpkins who dragged tombs up ramps and never changed.

This is just the last 7 days.

Lets break it down one step further:
1)...parsing the PT while in complete agreement that the ancients were superstitious and dragged tombs up ramps.
2)...tomb dragged up ramps by changeless and superstitious bumpkins....
3)...superstitious...mustta used ramps...anything but tombs.
4)...changeless superstitious bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps.
5)...ramps and tombs...
6)...stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps....
7)...dragging all those stones up the ramps...mustta had stinky feet.
8)...stinky footed bumpkins...
9)...stinky footed bumpkins could only have used ramps.
10)...stinky footed bumpkins dragging tombs up ramps...mustta been dragged up ramps....stinky footed bumpkin....
11)...tombs dragged up ramps by superstitious and changeless people...tombs, ramps, and superstition....
12)...superstitious...ramps are debunked.
13)...stinky footed bumpkins who dragged tombs up ramps and never changed.

And this is just the last 7 days. Which says nothing of your equally repetitive hobby horsing nonsense day after day about evil Egyptology and how they never do real science et al.

And you all think the reason why the "establishment" could care less what you buffoons say on an internet forum or bush-league books is really because they are "threatened" that your "revolutionary ideas" based on no scholarship and complete and utter self-absorbed delusional BS is because they are "afraid" it might somehow overturn "established paradigms"??? Lol. Get a good nights sleep because I can promise you this is not the reason.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 3202 loveritas 25-Sep-16 10:45
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 888 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:25
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 958 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 13:47
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 887 cladking 25-Sep-16 13:57
Re: Creighton v Vyse : Court Resumes 786 D-Archer 26-Sep-16 13:40
"The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 947 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:52
My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 979 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 16:54
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 947 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:52
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 777 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:37
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 872 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 19:36
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 856 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:42
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 819 Thanos5150 25-Sep-16 21:05
Re: My Lord, I call a surprise witness: SCOTT CREIGHTON 783 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:11
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 807 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 17:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 771 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 18:05
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 801 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 18:19
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 833 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 19:35
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 753 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 19:53
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 717 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:00
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 799 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 20:16
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 837 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 20:50
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 732 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 23:07
Right To Review. 733 DScribr 26-Sep-16 13:31
Re: Right To Review. 770 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:23
Re: Right To Review. 742 DScribr 27-Sep-16 03:34
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 838 R Avry Wilson 25-Sep-16 21:24
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 817 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 21:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 831 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 01:17
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 892 cladking 26-Sep-16 02:03
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 821 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 09:26
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 772 cladking 26-Sep-16 13:52
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 787 Martin Stower 30-Sep-16 00:06
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 802 cladking 30-Sep-16 01:33
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 806 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 14:21
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 633 cladking 26-Sep-16 15:04
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 770 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 13:48
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 762 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:12
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 765 R Avry Wilson 26-Sep-16 21:36
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 702 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:43
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 737 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 01:40
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 834 cladking 25-Sep-16 21:49
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 806 LonelyAngel 25-Sep-16 22:07
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 757 cladking 25-Sep-16 22:18
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 829 Martin Stower 25-Sep-16 22:45
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 838 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 10:31
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 723 Origyptian 26-Sep-16 15:29
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 835 LonelyAngel 26-Sep-16 15:44
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 801 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 13:13
Re: "The book is downright uninteresting" yet he couldn't wait to write lengthy hatchet job review 860 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 18:11
Re: The New Inquisition 901 Thunderbird 26-Sep-16 20:35
Re: The New Inquisition 710 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:43
Re: The New Inquisition 670 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:24
Re: The New Inquisition 756 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 21:53
Re: The New Inquisition 785 cladking 26-Sep-16 23:27
Re: The New Inquisition 737 Thanos5150 26-Sep-16 23:31
Re: The New Inquisition 735 cladking 27-Sep-16 01:25
The old copy/paste trick....... 842 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:28
Re: The Conspiracy 703 Thunderbird 27-Sep-16 00:58
Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1218 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 17:01
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 1016 eyeofhorus33 26-Sep-16 19:54
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 829 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 20:26
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 758 M. J. Thomas 26-Sep-16 20:20
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 771 cladking 26-Sep-16 21:31
Lover's premise 855 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:18
Re: Lover's premise 743 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:20
Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 853 DScribr 27-Sep-16 18:39
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! 975 Martin Stower 27-Sep-16 19:16
Re: Jason Colavito IS a credible expert witness! (I swear it!!!) 961 DScribr 28-Sep-16 00:21
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 819 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 20:38
Re: Is Jason Colavito a credible expert witness? 772 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 20:47
Oh Oh 859 drrayeye 26-Sep-16 22:20
Re: Oh Oh 700 Martin Stower 26-Sep-16 22:25
Re: Oh Oh 833 Barbelo 26-Sep-16 22:26
Re: Oh Oh 736 drrayeye 27-Sep-16 06:33
You're Not On The Same Page 803 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:19
You've got a lot to learn 816 drrayeye 29-Sep-16 05:36
Re: You've got a lot to learn 841 Barbelo 29-Sep-16 07:04
Re: You've got a lot to learn 744 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:13
Re: You've got a lot to learn 775 DScribr 29-Sep-16 18:23
Re: You've got a lot to learn 690 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:58
Re: You've got a lot to learn 901 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:16
Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 739 cladking 27-Sep-16 04:10
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 827 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 06:02
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 747 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 10:23
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 798 cladking 27-Sep-16 15:14
Re: Can anyone be a credible expert witness? 742 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:11
Living in the dark ages. 723 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:00
Re: Living in the dark ages. 781 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 14:35
Re: Living in the dark ages. 786 cladking 27-Sep-16 14:51
Re: Living in the dark ages. 777 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 754 cladking 27-Sep-16 16:11
Re: Living in the dark ages. 737 Barbelo 27-Sep-16 21:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 735 Origyptian 27-Sep-16 21:36
Re: Living in the dark ages. 699 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 14:16
Re: Living in the dark ages. 773 Origyptian 29-Sep-16 14:31
Re: Living in the dark ages. 737 Martin Stower 29-Sep-16 15:33
Re: Living in the dark ages. 874 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 16:54
Re: Living in the dark ages. 827 cladking 27-Sep-16 17:22
Re: Living in the dark ages. 741 Thanos5150 27-Sep-16 18:02
Re: Living in the dark ages. 744 cladking 27-Sep-16 18:14
Oooohh... touchy 927 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 711 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 19:24
Re: Oooohh... touchy 927 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 19:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 817 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:08
Re: Oooohh... touchy 785 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 588 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 21:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 786 LonelyAngel 05-Oct-16 21:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 716 Martin Stower 05-Oct-16 22:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 856 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 09:43
Re: Oooohh... touchy 762 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 11:56
Re: Oooohh... touchy 775 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 13:44
Re: Oooohh... touchy 640 earllt 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Oooohh... touchy 676 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 743 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 15:19
Re: Oooohh... touchy 724 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 15:28
Re: Oooohh... touchy 848 Martin Stower 06-Oct-16 20:18
Re: Oooohh... touchy 748 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 665 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 10:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 643 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 10:40
Re: Oooohh... touchy 680 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 11:26
Re: Oooohh... touchy 735 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 11:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 696 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 12:10
Re: Oooohh... touchy 745 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 12:45
Re: Oooohh... touchy 727 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:05
Re: Oooohh... touchy 713 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 718 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:42
Re: Oooohh... touchy 725 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 13:48
Re: Oooohh... touchy 646 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 13:55
Re: Oooohh... touchy 701 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 14:00
Re: Oooohh... touchy 753 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 14:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 730 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 718 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 15:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 597 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 15:47
Re: Oooohh... touchy 692 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 16:37
Re: Oooohh... touchy 719 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Oooohh... touchy 704 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 18:22
Re: Oooohh... touchy 721 Jon Ellison 07-Oct-16 18:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 722 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 19:02
Re: Oooohh... touchy 679 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 20:01
Re: Oooohh... touchy 668 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 20:58
Re: Oooohh... touchy 685 LonelyAngel 07-Oct-16 21:52
Re: Oooohh... touchy 971 Martin Stower 07-Oct-16 22:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 779 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 10:29
Re: Oooohh... touchy 694 Morten 08-Oct-16 15:36
Re: Oooohh... touchy 636 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:35
Re: Oooohh... touchy 727 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 17:41
Re: Oooohh... touchy 887 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:01
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 623 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 20:14
Re: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 691 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 20:35
Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 635 LonelyAngel 08-Oct-16 21:03
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 761 Martin Stower 08-Oct-16 21:50
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 655 LonelyAngel 09-Oct-16 09:22
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 697 Martin Stower 09-Oct-16 16:46
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 735 LonelyAngel 10-Oct-16 10:27
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 914 Martin Stower 10-Oct-16 17:12
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 608 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 13:32
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 720 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 16:54
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 658 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 16:59
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 727 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 17:36
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 657 randompHactor 11-Oct-16 17:38
Re: Philosophy: Schrödinger's cat 678 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 18:10
The Three Stooges 831 LonelyAngel 11-Oct-16 19:52
Re: The Three Stooges 786 eyeofhorus33 11-Oct-16 19:55
Re: The Three Stooges 851 Martin Stower 11-Oct-16 23:02
Re: The Three Stooges 801 Luminescence 12-Oct-16 01:03
Re: Oooohh... touchy 750 Thunderbird 06-Oct-16 17:59
Racing for the Cliffs. 781 cladking 06-Oct-16 14:10
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 666 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:33
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 674 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:39
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 740 LonelyAngel 06-Oct-16 14:41
Re: Racing for the Cliffs. 797 Jon Ellison 06-Oct-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.