LonelyAngel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> .
> I would without pause take issue
> > with anyone who supports Creighton's works.
> >
>
> Without pause? Says it all.
>
> From your own words it is clear that it pointless
> to expect any intelligent argument from you

How you get from me taking issue with crap archaeology to a my ability to operate intelligently is perhaps deserving of a weekend-long TED symposium ... on Pluto.

You're welcome to book the conference and have at it.

- you
> are operating out of pure prejudice. And blanket
> prejudice at that.

Making logical intrusions into the crap Creighton propogates is not prejudice at all, Sean.


> You'll forgive me if I don't bother replying to
> you in future - anyone who trots out haughty
> clankers like "My perturbations are born out of
> distaste for very poor academia" on a forum like
> this is either a boor of the highest order or
> simply deluded.
>
> Like Mr Stower, I wish you the best of luck in the
> coming war. Especially after that damp squib from
> your blogger chappy.

And .. once again our anticipations of (even) an attempt by you to be substantive in response to M. Colavito's 'blog' in the OP are dashed upon the shores of Oisin.

I rather concur and agree you refrain from future correspondence with me if all you've got are tender perjoratives.

Best,
Avry