> Hi Robin,
> You have attributed allot of names to all of those
> passages and open areas.
Is there some reason that I should not have done so?
The names/labels are, after all, traditional (except for the passages either side of the Antechamber named by me).
> You may be right.
> I look
> at it with an open mind.
Are you implying that I – and perhaps others here – do not do so?
> I try my best not to come
> to conclusions, as I fear that would only limit my
What is the point in investigating something – in this case Lost Building Technology – if you do not intend to draw a conclusion?
Do you, perhaps, mean that when you reach a conclusion about something you do not treat it as absolute, but instead go on to see if you can find other possible conclusions?
> Rather, I look for anomalies. Some
> feature which may shed light on it's [sic] construction.
Anomalies such as…?
> The topic is lost building technology.
I am aware of this.
You asked me why the Grand Gallery points in the direction that it does.
I answered you.