For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural
’ Message Board).
If that reply is typical of Egyptology's treatment of scientific thought, it's no wonder how the field got so entangled in the pretzel logic of its funerary context, symbolic security non-devices, fabricating high probability "fact" from a series of low probability "ifs" in lieu of evidence, extrapolating wild leaps in logic from loose semantic interpretations, and a timeline that contrives such unfathomable constructs as "70 kings in 70 days".
I tried to advise you to understand the c14 issues enough to at least grasp sampling and contamination, but the only thing you got right in your previous post was your grammar. If you insist on arguing in a field of quantitative science that you don't understand, it's going to take a lot more than merely the confidence of your claim.
Where's that "video" you claimed is from the authors that contains the details of the sampling?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 15-Jul-16 17:16 by Origyptian.