Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > How was the "expected date" determined?
> >
> > Archaeological term: 'relative dating'. It was
> the
> > best guess given context, so to see if they got
> > the guess correct, C14 was brought in to test
> it.
>
> And so if C14 reveals a significantly different
> date than than "expected", which method do you
> challenge?


The expected/relative date. And you?


> > > "...only a few centuries old"?
> > > How did you draw that conclusion?
> >
> > Eye witness testimony. Why not look it up,
> Philip?
>
> How does one verify an eyewitness account from
> back in 800AD?

Hilarious. Why you think I meant 800AD shows you didn't (and probably never will) bother to do some reeaaly simple research and find out what I meant.

Rather than look it up, YOU plant a date into my words than proceed to give the impression of tearing down 'my' error. Strawman much? Likely you will never look up that term either, lazy as you are.

Ciao, Dr Phil.