Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OCaptain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > OCaptain Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > >
> > > > So, the chart shows that errors can happen,
> > not
> > > > that they did happen in the case of the
> 1995
> > > study.
> > > >
> > > > Where is THAT evidence? For the claims made
> > by
> > > you?
> > >
> > > I'm thinking you wouldn't be asking that if
> you
> > > understood how mortar is made, the great
> > affinity
> > > activated charcoal has for ambient organic
> > > particles, and C14 dating technology.
> >
> >
> > But the point of this thread isn't what I
> > personally know. It's about evidence for the
> GPs
> > being built before 4000 BCE. 14C dating , like
> > that referred to in the 1995 paper would be
> > crucial to understanding. If docunented flaws
> > exist within it, then there has to be evidence
> for
> > that.
>
> Well, that report constitutes "evidence" for some
> people who have cited it here. The flaws in that
> report are indeed flagrant, you just don't
> understand the method. Please investigate rather
> than trying to be cute with such a lame quip.
Absolutely, I will. Thanks for the recommendation. Any suggestions on where to start?
-------------------------------------------------------
> OCaptain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > OCaptain Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > >
> > > > So, the chart shows that errors can happen,
> > not
> > > > that they did happen in the case of the
> 1995
> > > study.
> > > >
> > > > Where is THAT evidence? For the claims made
> > by
> > > you?
> > >
> > > I'm thinking you wouldn't be asking that if
> you
> > > understood how mortar is made, the great
> > affinity
> > > activated charcoal has for ambient organic
> > > particles, and C14 dating technology.
> >
> >
> > But the point of this thread isn't what I
> > personally know. It's about evidence for the
> GPs
> > being built before 4000 BCE. 14C dating , like
> > that referred to in the 1995 paper would be
> > crucial to understanding. If docunented flaws
> > exist within it, then there has to be evidence
> for
> > that.
>
> Well, that report constitutes "evidence" for some
> people who have cited it here. The flaws in that
> report are indeed flagrant, you just don't
> understand the method. Please investigate rather
> than trying to be cute with such a lame quip.
Absolutely, I will. Thanks for the recommendation. Any suggestions on where to start?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.