Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OCaptain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > cladking Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > People see what they expect and then we talk
> > right
> > > past one another.
> > >
> > > It's almost like we have a confused language
> or
> > > something. ;)
> > >
> > > His question's been answered at least a dozen
> > ways
> > > (two dozen counting logic) but they are all
> > > invisible if you can't see them.
> >
> >
> > Logic only takes you so far. We need evidence
> > here.
>
> There were people here at the time.
>
> Are you telling me they couldn't have done it
> because they were only proto-stinky footed
> bumpkins? Are you seriously suggesting they
> weren't yet superstitious enough to lift stones?
>
> I guess a shouldda ignored this thread.
Yep. You probably should've. The first word of the OP thread title is "Evidence".
Hmmm...
-------------------------------------------------------
> OCaptain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > cladking Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > People see what they expect and then we talk
> > right
> > > past one another.
> > >
> > > It's almost like we have a confused language
> or
> > > something. ;)
> > >
> > > His question's been answered at least a dozen
> > ways
> > > (two dozen counting logic) but they are all
> > > invisible if you can't see them.
> >
> >
> > Logic only takes you so far. We need evidence
> > here.
>
> There were people here at the time.
>
> Are you telling me they couldn't have done it
> because they were only proto-stinky footed
> bumpkins? Are you seriously suggesting they
> weren't yet superstitious enough to lift stones?
>
> I guess a shouldda ignored this thread.
Yep. You probably should've. The first word of the OP thread title is "Evidence".
Hmmm...
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.