Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > OK, Thanos, for better or for worse, there are now
> > dozens of replies to your OP.
>
> I have no interest in quantity, just quality.
>
> > I'm thinking it's time that you to reciprocate and
> > submit your own thoughts about your original post.
>
> So you are asking me to provide the
> evidence to support your own beliefs for you?

What could I possibly have said in that short comment that compelled you to twist the words so significantly? I simply asked you to render your own opinion about whether there is any evidence that the pyramids were built before 4000 BC. You are the one that stated that paradigm, not me. So, what's your own position on the provenance of the pyramids? What "evidence" can you site that associates the pyramids with "who", or "when" or "why"?



> I have made my opinions on these matter quite
> clear, but this is not what this thread is about.

Well, I, too, have repeatedly and in large volume (based on the way some of you complain about the number of my posts) regarding the problems with an Old Kingdom provenance for the pyramids. I've mentioned countless times that we may not forget that the pyramids are indeed evidence reflecting the culture that built them, and that the pyramids cannot be accounted for by any known civilization.

You may discount any and all of that discussion, but the facts are there, the contradictions to historic cultures are there, the inability of anyone to plausibly associate the tools and methods required to build such a structure with any known civilization is not my opinion, it's all over these discussions.

So as I said, I'm not sure what you expected to get from your OP other than your reluctance to offer your own information, and your willingness to critize others for their offering their own information. So sorry it's not what you were looking for (or was it?).



> Has nothing to do with what I think or what
> Egyptologists think, ect, ect. The OP assumes
> these beliefs are true, that the AE did not make
> the stonework in question and that it all predates
> 4,000BC, therefore it asks what is the evidence to
> support this belief? Very simple. And despite all
> these posts still no answer.

I gave a very clear and tangible answer. You simply rejected it. Your privilege. Doesn't change my own approach one bit though. Thanks.