Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
R Avry Wilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > >
> > > Archaeologists having been looking for a long
> > > time, and there is nothing there. Until such
> > time
> > > as new evidence is found, the claim that the
> > AEs
> > > did not build the pyramids cannot stand. A
> > claim
> > > needs the evidence first, not the other way
> > > around. :)
> >
> > Where is the evidence that the AE did build the
> > pyramids?
> > You clearly stated that.. "A Claim needs
> evidence
> > first".
> > Where is that evidence?
> > Where are the tools?
> > Where are the writings?
> > Where is the artwork?
>
> Everywhere. Millions of individual, culturally
> connected artifacts. Yet again, you dodge
> the question of the OP: Let's say I agree with all
> your points above, and the AE did not build the
> pyramids.
>
> If the AE didn't build them (as I would be
> agreeing with you they didn't) WHO BUILT THEM?
> Provide the evidence for these 'WHO'. Bloody plain
> English grammar, John. Rather than give the
> evidence, you answer a question with a questions,
> question I might add have been accepted as part of
> your argument against the AEs having built them.
>
>
> We all know none of you can give the evidence
> because there is none ... and this in the face of
> EVEN BEING GIVEN THE
> AGREEMENT THE AE DID NOT
> BUILD THEM.
>
>
> > You stated that the "archaeologists have been
> > looking for a long time, and there is nothing
> > there".
> > Why is there nothing there?
>
> Because there's nothing there? Hello?
>
> > Why is there nothing other than the structures
> > themselves?
>
> Now you're getting it ... ! Awesome.
>
> > What could be the cause of everything being
> lost
> > other than natural stone?
>
> Strange question. How does stone play a physical
> part in making artifacts disappear?
>
> > What could be the cause of zero supporting
> > evidence.
>
> That there isn't any? That you can't conceive of
> this is hard to accept.
>
> > "Archaeologists have been looking for a long
> time
> > and there is nothing there"
> > "Nothing"
> > Why is there no pyramid archaeology for
> > archaeologists to find?
> > Why is there no pyramid archaeology to be found
> > right bang in the middle of the richest
> > archaeological region on the planet?
>
> Because there isn't any?
Avry, what is your fixation on the "who"? Why is the "who" more important than the "why" or "when" and what are you inferring from your conclusion that evidence is not forthcoming regarding the "who"?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > >
> > > Archaeologists having been looking for a long
> > > time, and there is nothing there. Until such
> > time
> > > as new evidence is found, the claim that the
> > AEs
> > > did not build the pyramids cannot stand. A
> > claim
> > > needs the evidence first, not the other way
> > > around. :)
> >
> > Where is the evidence that the AE did build the
> > pyramids?
> > You clearly stated that.. "A Claim needs
> evidence
> > first".
> > Where is that evidence?
> > Where are the tools?
> > Where are the writings?
> > Where is the artwork?
>
> Everywhere. Millions of individual, culturally
> connected artifacts. Yet again, you dodge
> the question of the OP: Let's say I agree with all
> your points above, and the AE did not build the
> pyramids.
>
> If the AE didn't build them (as I would be
> agreeing with you they didn't) WHO BUILT THEM?
> Provide the evidence for these 'WHO'. Bloody plain
> English grammar, John. Rather than give the
> evidence, you answer a question with a questions,
> question I might add have been accepted as part of
> your argument against the AEs having built them.
>
>
> We all know none of you can give the evidence
> because there is none ... and this in the face of
> EVEN BEING GIVEN THE
> AGREEMENT THE AE DID NOT
> BUILD THEM.
>
>
> > You stated that the "archaeologists have been
> > looking for a long time, and there is nothing
> > there".
> > Why is there nothing there?
>
> Because there's nothing there? Hello?
>
> > Why is there nothing other than the structures
> > themselves?
>
> Now you're getting it ... ! Awesome.
>
> > What could be the cause of everything being
> lost
> > other than natural stone?
>
> Strange question. How does stone play a physical
> part in making artifacts disappear?
>
> > What could be the cause of zero supporting
> > evidence.
>
> That there isn't any? That you can't conceive of
> this is hard to accept.
>
> > "Archaeologists have been looking for a long
> time
> > and there is nothing there"
> > "Nothing"
> > Why is there no pyramid archaeology for
> > archaeologists to find?
> > Why is there no pyramid archaeology to be found
> > right bang in the middle of the richest
> > archaeological region on the planet?
>
> Because there isn't any?
Avry, what is your fixation on the "who"? Why is the "who" more important than the "why" or "when" and what are you inferring from your conclusion that evidence is not forthcoming regarding the "who"?
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.