> If you have no evidence, John, you have no
> evidence. When you can't understand this concept,
> it is fair game to question your intelligence. I
> shall refrain at this juncture.
Ah! but we do have evidence.
Evidence in the mathematical relationships within the structure that have been demonstrated over and over and over.
We also have evidence in the necessarily employed applied mathematics embedded within the structure. Which again we can directly measure and observe today.
The structure itself bears witness to the impossibility of AE provenance, if the current archaeological record of the early bronze age is correct and to be believed.
We have evidence that SOMEONE with all of the above attributes constructed the pyramid.
We are not claiming to know exactly who or when. We just leave it at "SOMEONE"
Just like the Goblekli Tepi archaeologists, we are happy to conclude at this time that we do not know exactly who or why.
You are claiming to know exactly who and when and why.
You are claiming without hard evidence to know with certainty who constructed the monument and when they constructed the monument and why they constructed the monument.
You are claiming that without supporting evidence such as tools and a knowledge of advanced mathematics the 4th AE were able to construct the monument.
You are the one making the claim to know precisely who why and when..
For me it is "SOMEONE" as yet to be identified.
Just like the builders of Goblekli Tepi.
You are making the precise claim.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12-Jul-16 23:19 by Jon Ellison.