WonderWho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Egyptologists themselves provide the best evidence
> that the Giza Pyramids were not built by the AE.
> The Gizamid alignment to the cardinal points
> (especially the GP), the belt stars of Orion and
> the incorporation of PI, PHI, SQRT(2), SQRT(3),
> circumference of earth, etc. into their
> construction argues against the AE building them.

But this says nothing about WHEN they were built which is clearly stated is the purpose of the OP not to mention all the megalithic temples and stone artifacts.

> Egyptology tells us Orion was not a 'big cheese'
> during the Pyramid era,

They do?

> that the AE did not have
> knowledge of PI or square roots. Egyptology tells
> us that pan generational projects were verboten.

So what does this have to do with WHEN?

> Thus, we must either conclude that this
> preponderance of mathematical and astronomical
> evidence is pure coincidence or that a culture,
> where such concepts were important, built the
> Gizamids.

Again, this has nothing to do with WHEN. If the AE were not capable of such things it proves nothing as to when it was built and if anything just as easily proves that the culture it was important to used the AE as labor during the Dynastic period.

The OP specifically asks for evidence that the megalithic monuments and stonework were made by a culture prior to 4,000BC. This is a topic of interest for many here yet no one can offer any evidence to back it up. Does it not exist?



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12-Jul-16 03:50 by Thanos5150.