> > Regarding "pathetic little simp", I've seen worse
> > invectives hurled down the halls recently at GHMB.
> > "Retarded" and "idiot" come to mind.
> Can you cite an example where someone has been
> called an "idiot"? And were you
> called a retard or just asked if you were
> retarded? Which I think we are still waiting your
> answer. Here is another example of your dishonesty
> not to mention intellectual laziness. I lie you
> have perpetrated before.
Obviously, you're too unhinged at this point to even understand your own posts.
- I didn't say you called me a "retard". If you read your own quoted post above, I clearly said "retarded", as if that makes any difference to a rational person. But that said...
> Can you cite an example where someone has been called an "idiot"?
> > I'd like to hear your
> > take on why you think it's ok for someone to post
> > modern drawings as some kind of validation of what
> > took place a few millennia years ago
> Again, why are you being so dishonest? It's
> bewildering. It was an artist's rendering of what
> it may have looked like...
I have no interest in how artists thought it looked and I didn't ask you that so I don't know why you included those. Rather, I am asking what ancient physical evidence there is that supports the notion that there were flag poles in those recesses. You're answer wasn't simply "here's an example of what some people think". Instead, you predictably became unhinged and commence with your medieval name calling with "idiot", "retarded", " retard", "liar", and "dishonest".
But it's all too clear who's being dishonest here.
Just as it's clear who trashed this discussion.
Respectfully, if it really is so utterly impossible for you to be civil when someone disagrees with you, then kindly STHU.
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?