> Well, some people might interpret it as an
> expression of "shock or surprise" that someone is
> so utterly unable to accept disagreement in a
> discussion forum about unexplained mysteries
> around the world.
No one being honest would interpret it that way. Jon said: "So STFU you pathetic little simp!" I fail to see the "surprise". But you know that and are just lying Origypitan so maybe you should STFU.
Just like no honest person would chalk the problem to someone being "so utterly unable to accept disagreement in a discussion about unexplained mysteries around the world". I truly cannot comprehend why it is so hard for you two to just be honest. It makes no sense. It's weird and creepy. How many times must it be said, proven time and again by the very words we write, what myself, and others, are so utterly unable to accept is your bald face dishonesty and intellectual fraudulence all delivered by nothing more than the authority of your ignorance for no other reason than to further your agenda and not lose arguments. T-Bird and I were "disagreeing" on this very thread yet you don't see us fighting do you? In fact it seems the only people others fight with are you two (and Audrey). And yet everyone else is to blame but yourselves? Hint-it has nothing to do with your beliefs.
> Regarding "pathetic little simp", I've seen worse
> invectives hurled down the halls recently at GHMB.
> "Retarded" and "idiot" come to mind.
Can you cite an example where someone has been called an "idiot"? And were you called a retard or just asked if you were retarded? Which I think we are still waiting your answer. Here is another example of your dishonesty not to mention intellectual laziness. The same lie you have perpetrated many times before.
> I'd like to hear your
> take on why you think it's ok for someone to post
> modern drawings as some kind of validation of what
> took place a few millennia years ago
Again, why are you being so dishonest? It's bewildering. It was an artist's rendering of what it may have looked like to visualize that the gods were placed in their positions to look like they were holding the flags which is what we were discussing at that point:
As far as the placement of the large figures which you claim "There's nothing more annoying to a graffiti artist
than running out of space due to lack of forethought and pre-planning." and "Well they certainly put an awful lot of manual effort into the embellishment. Maybe they couldn't do lay out artwork.", apparently because their outstretched arms cross the plane of the inset borders hence why you took the time to zoom in and blow this section up-did it ever occur to you that once again you have no idea what you are talking about and that these figures were placed there for a reason? Like say to appear as if these gods were holding the flags of the pharaoh?
The[y] [the gods] were not placed the way they were because they [the artists] "ran out of room" or because they "couldn't do layout artwork", they placed them exactly where they wanted them to be to serve a function.
If you are not being dishonest by purposefully mischaracterizing what I said, then how is it you do not understand why it was offered? Don't need to take my word for it as anyone can see for themselves right HERE.
After you have read this explain why you are lying and/or how you misunderstood why the drawing was offered?
> while that
> same person cries foul then someone else dodges
> out the graffiti on modern ruins in an attempt to
> depict the architecture before it was defaced.
Egads. Why do you keep lying Origyptian? Why? Quote me where I "cried foul" regarding Jon's manipulation of the photo? Again, we can actually read what was said from the very same post as cited above:
And what is the point of your posting the pictures of the same view 4 times in one post? And you seriously took the time to wash out the art from this photo:
Which even Jon understood I was not "crying foul" but rather chiding him for wasting the time:
It took no more time than a typical photo bomb.
"Washing out" as you put it, took about two minutes.
I feel it was worth the investment in order to visualise the building prior to the embellishments being added.
Where you have gone wrong, as usual is that you read nothing and understand less and ignored everything that was said other than this post of Jon's.
Which my reply was this:
Think about it-Jon first acknowledges I was referring to him wasting time yet several posts later he barfs up this ball of crazy:
So here we are..
According to Thanos..
It began like this.. (My image)
Whaaat?? There is no point in wasting more time, but literally every other point he makes in that post is literally the exact opposite of true.
So the question is why are you lying? Why does Jon keep lying? Why time and again do the both of you blatantly misrepresent what other people say? Explain yourself. So many times it has been said it is your fraudulent and intellectually lazy behavior that is why you draw such ire yet time and again you lie and say it is because people "disagree with you".
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 04-Aug-17 17:17 by Thanos5150.