> Hello Jon and Philip
> Adaption of extant building is the True history
> which Egyptology goes into extreme apologist over,
> ...or does Ostrich/head in the sand : )
> Robert Temple in this publish reveals the common
> sense perspective on 2 Ancient Egyptian/Pre
> Dynastic sites,which were never complete
> Rather..they were built as Stellar Cartography
> platforms to map Arc minute time of the Heavens
> for North/South and East/West.
> Gobekli Tepe with its 21 known ring constructions
> is mapping time since 9000bc.
> Obviously this was of great import to then
> cultures...as it continued over time.
> We may not at present understand all etched
> symbolism on the pillars,
> Yet..the Moon and Sun monthly/seasonal cycles are
> present,...with several well defined glyphs for
> Zodiac locations.
> The Sky God's imprinting of Dynastic Egypt is
> something the migrant Mesopotamia/Levant
> They were in the land during Naqada eras/Pre
> Dynastic. ....Abydos with its Royal burials on
> Sumerian death rite model is not some adventure
> outcome going wrong,
> They explored Pre Dynastic Egypt and set their
> signature upon what was extant.
> Jon's post last year on recycled blocks with
> machining bores in them,Actual age of Said blocks
> is question.
> They were recycled...Which supports Adaption
> theory,...before Dynastic Egypt was tabled
> By Mainstream Egyptology.
> The Sphinx and the tiers of Valley Temples before
> it and other** ..which use huge Limestone blocks
> hewn from the Sphinx pit,
> This contradicts Dynastic Egyptian timeline of the
> Pushes these builds outside of mainstream
> Egyptology build timeline.
> Points to Adaption of extant building.
> Snefru did not build the Sphinx or these
> Temples,...nor did Khufu Family.
> They both adapt upon extant structures...
> The 26th Dynasty Stela about Khufu reveals his
> administration on Giza plateau.
> Repairing the Sphinx along with projects such as
> Year 5 Mastaba field building for His Elites, ..is
> large statement towards Adaption of extant field
> constructions which his socio simply continues.
> The Mastaba fields with Socio Afterlife art in
> painting and doorway/or build relief perfectly
> shows the import of socio customs,...much like the
> Abydos Royal Burials.
> The 3 Pyramids at Giza, ..including the other
> large Pyramids attributed to Snefru reveal no
> organized socio designing towards Pharaonic
> Tomb/Afterlife Journey.
> Mainstream Egyptology is repeating fake news since
> 1800s. ...some kind of deranged
> Christian 6000 year Earth which needs Khufu to be
> builder to support the Church position
> On Time.
> Gunpowder Howard Vyse wasn't the only kook to seek
> fame and fortune while sticking to Church
> The Pacific Ocean has completed swap out of
> Giant races being the former,...who left
> megalithic building as witness of their
> The argument of some that these races were never
> Giants, ..but we're more Robust stature humans is
> extreme Apologist tact.
> The Giant races are dismissed. ..and the
> Adaption of extant building by migrating cultures
> is also dismissed.
> Supposedly. ...Mesopotamia /Levant toured Pre
> Dynastic Egypt. ...finding nothing, So they went
> home,...or in the case of those Burials at
> Abydos,.. .you had a funeral after a death in the
> family while travelling : )
> Seeing how today's Fake news and US/NATO hysteria
> over Russia having future energy contracts and
> friends in the world community,
> It is no surprise to see the outrageous demand
> continual of the Church/Egyptian history side....
> Trump and his travelling circus would merge with
> Gunpowder Howard Vyse,
> All being One...under the label of... its Just
> Good Business** ...Lord Cutler Beckett /Pirates of
> the Caribbean movie : )
> T Bird
Thanks for the tour, T'bird and thanks for correctly characterizing it as "adaption" rather than "adoption".
Previous investigators who saw the evidence that those buildings were recycled after they were originally constructed tended to gravitate toward "adoption", but "adoption" refers to usurping something that already exists and using it for the same original purpose. When you adopt the child, it's still for the purpose of parenting to raise a child. When a Catholic church closes down and the Baptists take it over as a church of their own, that's also adoption.
"Adaption", however, refers to usurping something for a different use and purpose than was originally intended. Buying a defunct church and turning it into a pub called "The House Of Grog" is adaption, not adoption.
And so if you buy a used car and still use it as a car to drive around town, etc., that's adoption. But if you buy a used car and use it as customer seating in a boutique cafe, that's adaption.
If the funerary Dynastics really did acquire pre-existing pyramids for their own funerary purposes, I believe that represents adaption, not adoption, because I see no evidence that the early pyramids were ever intended to be used for funerary purposes by their designers and builders. Jon's superb analysis of the details of the Ascending Passage provides us with yet another argument that this pyramid was not designed for a funerary purpose. And so if the Dynastics really did use that pyramid to support their funerary paradigm, as many traditionalists insist they did, then I believe such use represents adaption, not adoption.
There are many examples of what appears to be adaption in the ancient ruins, and not limited to Egypt.
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02-Aug-17 12:16 by Origyptian.