Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thunderbird Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Excerpt from : The Great Pyramid Hoax
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > Now we have the evidence of the red ochre paint
> > runs : )
>
> If this is new to you, we can only wonder which
> planet you’ve been on (and which one you are on
> now).
>
> The question was vigorously debated on this board
> and elsewhere.
>
> I dare say we all know what runny paint looks
> like. Anyone who’s looked at the pictures will
> know that the paint just doesn’t look like this.
> Some will remember that Creighton “found” his
> paint runs by arbitrary manipulation of images, an
> epitome of his method overall.
>
> Another worthless point you’ve given a fanfare.
>
> M.

Hi Martin

I believe you ought congratulate T'Bird for promoting this fanfare.

Neither Creighton , Snape, Femano, and other associated groupies, have ever been in the RC's.
They have only obtained photo's from the internet (enhanced and manipulated) and their "independent research" consists entirely of rambling inane speculative inconsistent incoherent fantasies.

Meanwhile many high profile "fringe" or "alternative" full time professional authors and guides HAVE inspected the RC's and unanimously declare the marks and cartouches to be original to build.

Also if one was "faked" then all such including Lady A's had to be faked too! to provide any reason to concoct any such wild conjecture!

Hundreds of trained professionals and thousands of visitors, many documentary makers, have inspected the cartouche since 1837 and none of them have reported this "runny streak" anomoly.

ONLY our very own amateur provocateur with his delusional fantasy "HIGHER standards of proof" (ROFL!) has noticed (dreamt it up) it from staring at the interwebbys!

It is ironic that this trash is called The Great Pyramid Hoax.

The only hoax is the BS it spins! Piled higher and Deeper


I undertand why Mainstream Egyptology would be outraged by such rubbish, and wonder whether our host GH would be annoyed that such low grade rubbish, could infect his market and potential target audience? Or is even promoted on his website message board?

Let alone the implied insult to his own eye witness published retraction/opinion on this matter!

Maybe marginally acceptable for a silly stoush on an internet chat site... but to publish as "evidence"? Scrapping the very bottom of the barrel in desperation and disgraceful!

Regards

Over and out!