Audrey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > I sriously doubt you will say, 'ah, C14, ok then,
> > I now accept the boat and pit are from the mid-3rd
> > millennium BCE, that the cartouche was sealed
> > inside and unavailable to Vyse to plant
> > fraudulently, and that therefore the relieving
> > chamber markings are legitimate, and the Giza
> > pyramids were built by the ancient Egyptians of
> > that timeframe'.
>
> The cartouche was not sealed inside the boat pit.

Yes, it was. No one could get at where the cartouche is without lifting the covering block out of the pit—and to do that one would have to know that the pit is there in the first place. Evidence that this was known before 1954?

Are you now going to tell us that Yoshimura is a Vyse-style forger?

> The boat pit cartouche does not give validity to Vyses.

Yes, it does. It undercuts the presumption which is the entire basis of the accusation levelled at Vyse.

> There were already other cartouches found for Vyse
> to copy from. A point you ignore.

He was right to ignore it.

How many times do we have to explain to you that no one has claimed that the names (plural) reported by Vyse were previously unknown? So fixated are you on this straw man that you misperceive Warwick and Avry’s quite different point as an example of it.

> > > > No matter what evidence is given to you, you
> > > > always leapfrog around it.
>
> There is no absolutely no evidence to say this
> Khufu thing built G1. Egyptology tries to use
> Vyse's cartouche as proof because they have
> nothing else.

Which just goes to show that you share the characteristic.

M.