> Why aren’t you telling him (and everyone else)
> that you can’t just ignore the statistical
> aspect of a topic like this?
Because the statistical report was based on an assumption. The assumption was that extreme dates sitting outside the existing paradigm could not be considered.
I choose to consider and include the extreme dates, taken individually and at face value, and not assume the above.
> Where are these “higher standards of proof”
> I’ve been hearing about? Does this represent
Yes. The elimination of assumption.