Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The list of logical flaws in the '95 study goes on
> and on.
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,35
> 1305,351368#msg-351368]In my opinion[/url].

What you wrote is food for thought. And since I'm not willing to invest the time to gather more knowledge on the subject than you have, I will consider yours an informed opinion. In essence, the C14 dating was a waste of time, no concessions have been made. So much for science.

> If I carve "Origyptian" into the cement footing of
> the Golden Gate Bridge, does that mean
> Americologists from the 42nd century AD will
> conclude that a King Origyptian commissioned the
> construction of that bridge?

Yes, and if you leave your coffee cup there that will cement the evidence. Origyptian will be the God of Fog and there will be 15 ways to spell the name. Backwards, bottom to top, top to bottom, syllables omitted, others added, compressed and expanded to make it symmetrical. There will be 3 new grammar rules to accommodate these variants. If the sea level drops and SF bay dries, the bridge will become the largest strangest tomb in the world, the water damage on piers being completely ignored. With all traces of the 49ers gone, SF itself will be the city of the builders with it's many shops and banks. The Chinese may get all the credit tho' if only their pottery survives, making your coffee cup a special piece reserved for gods and the forerunner of the sacred Ameriglyphs.

And so it goes