You're right, it doesn't. From the O.P: To quote Wilkinson regarding the 2nd Dynasty:
The kings who ruled Egypt between the death of Qaa and the accession of Netjerikhet/Djoser are some of the most shadowy figures from the entire span of Egyptian history (cf. Dodson 1996). The inscriptions and monuments from the period record a plethora of royal names, as do the surviving king lists. The names of these two sets of sources bear little relation to each other. It has proved difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile the varying lists and sequences, and scholars today are scarcely more confident about the internal history of the Second Dynasty than were their predecessors a generation ago.
It's always been more difficult to correctly read early, (and Pre)dynastic symbols due to a shortage of info.
Maybe the 2 lists cover the same time frame and one names Lower E Kings and the other the Upper E Kings. Also, the destruction of old, and/or adding new names/symbols make it even more difficult for us. Much more work needs to be done at Abydos, etc.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."