drrayeye Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This may go over well in Australia,
>
> but here your jocular style doesn't always work.

But where, after all, is here? The board has no nation.

> You can indicate lack of interest in purchasing
> Scott's book, based on his article and a review of
> the promotional materials on this website with
> much more subtlety. To turn on your fellow
> bloggers with personal insults is where I think
> you cross the line. I disagree with almost
> everyone, one time or another, but I'm grateful
> for the companionship, opportunities to learn, and
> good cheer from fellow GHMB members--less when
> they correct my mistakes, but I get over it.
>
> As a relative newcomer, you may not be aware, but
> there may have been a hundred or more thoughtful
> bloggers that have participated in discussions of
> these issues at GHMB over the years--and most of
> them considered questions that you choose to
> dismiss rather carelessly.
>
> I'm sure that Scott will present an interesting,
> but ultimately unconvincing analysis, but there
> have been many before and will be many after who
> will similarly fall short. I've always
> appreciated his efforts. I will be satisfied with
> a few new alternatives to consider. . .
>
> Ray

I differ. The case calls for Ocker’s Razor.

M.