Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
drrayeye Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This may go over well in Australia,
>
> but here your jocular style doesn't always work.
But where, after all, is here? The board has no nation.
> You can indicate lack of interest in purchasing
> Scott's book, based on his article and a review of
> the promotional materials on this website with
> much more subtlety. To turn on your fellow
> bloggers with personal insults is where I think
> you cross the line. I disagree with almost
> everyone, one time or another, but I'm grateful
> for the companionship, opportunities to learn, and
> good cheer from fellow GHMB members--less when
> they correct my mistakes, but I get over it.
>
> As a relative newcomer, you may not be aware, but
> there may have been a hundred or more thoughtful
> bloggers that have participated in discussions of
> these issues at GHMB over the years--and most of
> them considered questions that you choose to
> dismiss rather carelessly.
>
> I'm sure that Scott will present an interesting,
> but ultimately unconvincing analysis, but there
> have been many before and will be many after who
> will similarly fall short. I've always
> appreciated his efforts. I will be satisfied with
> a few new alternatives to consider. . .
>
> Ray
I differ. The case calls for Ocker’s Razor.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> This may go over well in Australia,
>
> but here your jocular style doesn't always work.
But where, after all, is here? The board has no nation.
> You can indicate lack of interest in purchasing
> Scott's book, based on his article and a review of
> the promotional materials on this website with
> much more subtlety. To turn on your fellow
> bloggers with personal insults is where I think
> you cross the line. I disagree with almost
> everyone, one time or another, but I'm grateful
> for the companionship, opportunities to learn, and
> good cheer from fellow GHMB members--less when
> they correct my mistakes, but I get over it.
>
> As a relative newcomer, you may not be aware, but
> there may have been a hundred or more thoughtful
> bloggers that have participated in discussions of
> these issues at GHMB over the years--and most of
> them considered questions that you choose to
> dismiss rather carelessly.
>
> I'm sure that Scott will present an interesting,
> but ultimately unconvincing analysis, but there
> have been many before and will be many after who
> will similarly fall short. I've always
> appreciated his efforts. I will be satisfied with
> a few new alternatives to consider. . .
>
> Ray
I differ. The case calls for Ocker’s Razor.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.