Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
eyeofhorus33 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon and Audrey
>
> Either Audrey has failed to grasp your explanation
> of the brush strokes completely (this was my first
> guess), or you have changed your "expert opinion"
> since Audrey first grasped it. Which is it, Jon?
>
> She claims that the cartouche starts at the
> "bottom" at the brush strokes go "upwards."
>
> You, however, explain that it goes from "top to
> bottom" - or, if in a horizontal position, the
> lateral inscription was written from "left to
> right" which means that Audrey's understanding
> runs counter to your own.
>
> Is is any wonder that Creighton's defence team is
> considered a "shambles" by court attendees?
>
> Hilarious!
>
> :)
The Entire artwork cartouche and phyle name was painted starting at the top as we see it today. With one arm of the tongs.
The Cartouche loop, and only the cartouche loop was painted starting at the five o'clock position, counter-clockwise ending at the seven o'clock position.
The artwork in its entirety was started at the top.
The cartouche loop, one of many single gestures, was started at the bottom.
Audrey is fully aware of and fully understands this principle, hence her remarks.
All of the above is according to my own analyses based on the methodology previously described.
You are perfectly free to carry out your own analyses and I would recommend that you or anyone else should do so.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 30-Jun-16 06:52 by Jon Ellison.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon and Audrey
>
> Either Audrey has failed to grasp your explanation
> of the brush strokes completely (this was my first
> guess), or you have changed your "expert opinion"
> since Audrey first grasped it. Which is it, Jon?
>
> She claims that the cartouche starts at the
> "bottom" at the brush strokes go "upwards."
>
> You, however, explain that it goes from "top to
> bottom" - or, if in a horizontal position, the
> lateral inscription was written from "left to
> right" which means that Audrey's understanding
> runs counter to your own.
>
> Is is any wonder that Creighton's defence team is
> considered a "shambles" by court attendees?
>
> Hilarious!
>
> :)
The Entire artwork cartouche and phyle name was painted starting at the top as we see it today. With one arm of the tongs.
The Cartouche loop, and only the cartouche loop was painted starting at the five o'clock position, counter-clockwise ending at the seven o'clock position.
The artwork in its entirety was started at the top.
The cartouche loop, one of many single gestures, was started at the bottom.
Audrey is fully aware of and fully understands this principle, hence her remarks.
All of the above is according to my own analyses based on the methodology previously described.
You are perfectly free to carry out your own analyses and I would recommend that you or anyone else should do so.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 30-Jun-16 06:52 by Jon Ellison.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.