Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Jon

Thank you for your reply. However I was disappointed with the lack of detail provided.

Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Are the matters listed above in bold, the sort
> of
> > detailed analysis Creighton commissioned in
> your
> > report?
> > Can we expect to read your full "expert
> analysis"
> > and substantive supportive arguments for your
> > conclusions?
>
> No. It would be far better if you carried out your
> own analyses.


So are you suggesting that your contribution to Creighton's book is so sparse and flakey (I suspect virtually non existent) that person like me (btw who holds several degrees inc post grad) but none in Art is in just as good position to assess the cartouche as you in fact "better"?

> >
> > If not, are you able to share the answers to
> these
> > questions on GHMB now? Or are they "report"
> > secrets contracted and not available for public
> > viewing?
>
> As above.
> >
> > IOW ....Is that in the book? Or don't you know
> > what Creighton is putting in the book, which is
> > apparently attributed by name to your
> independent
> > research and expertise? If not, don't you
> > professionally care whether SC distorts your
> > expert analysis?
>
> Once any job has been completed and passed on
> there is very little any originator can do to
> control it.

>
>

Again I am thoroughly disappointed. I would expect a serious publication that cites an independent researcher and expert to at least refer to a detailed report which I would expect be included unmodified as an Appendix! Perhaps with an introduction indicating the background and verification of said "expert".

To comment on the cartouche as an "art expert" I would expect to see some explanation of the bridge between art and study of painted hieratic on stone.

Things like :
-your detailed study of the types of brushes or writing implements eg camel hair or fibrous wooden etc.
- your extensive study of multiple painted glyphs and hieractic from other sites
- Your replication of the exercise of painting a cartouche on an angled stone and a flat stone
-detailed explaination as to why it is impossible to have been painted flat in a quarry

Lots of other things, but you ought know that if you were an "expert".

So, I ask again is there significant detail of your own work in Creighton's book?

It seems all that has happened is that as a wet behind the ears newbie to GHMB you posted a theory, it was picked up by SC, then some clarifying private email exchanges and that is ALL? Perhaps he didn't even seek your authorisation to use your real name?


>
> > > My "Expert" expertise was only required to
> make
> > > people aware that this method exists..
> > > Which Scott and I did.
> >
>
> I think that any modern human would be capable of
> determining the brush stroke sequence, once they
> had been made aware of it as an analytical tool.
> It's for this reason that I would encourage you to
> carry out your own analyses and draw your own
> conclusions.

>

No expert required? No expert opinion with substantiated support given?


>
>
>
>
> It may be necessary to zoom in to see the
> crossovers, intercepts and modulation.
> This is intended only as a sequence awareness
> guide as it has obviously been edited.
> Please refer to an original photograph available
> online and carry out your own analyses.


Thank you for the great blown up pic of Monet's water lily's. I can see the layering and have some idea of the brush sequence. It helps of course to know Monet was right handed.



> A point to bear in mind is the stroke sequencing,
> painted horizontally vs. vertically.
> How would you begin if you were painting
> horizontally vs. vertically?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

This is interesting. Is this the type of stuff you did to determine the cartouche brush strokes were made in situ? Can you explain why the same thing cannot have been made vertically on a flat surface in the quarry?

> >
> > >
> > > People are intelligent and can form their own
> > > opinions. They are not sheep.
> >
> > Unfortunately , some people have a bias, then
> they > > find (conjure or imagine) conformational bias!
>
> True but that bias is the result of a plethora of
> other inputs that may not be the result of the
> pure and direct observation of the primary source.
> Which is the cartouche itself.
> In order to be objective one has to disregard the
> "is it" or "isn't it" conflict and work solely
> with the data.


However, your data consists of only a couple of pictures. You claim to see paint runs. I have stared at it like I suspect many others and do not see any paint runs! Nor clear indication of vertical/horizontal strokes
> >
> >
> > In your expert analysis:
> >
> > Did you examine all (high res photos) of the
> other
> > cartouches and quarry marks Wellington Nelson
> > upwards particularly the vertical painting
> upside
> > down in Lady Aburthnot's?
>
> None available.
> >
> > Are there any microscopic tell tale paint runs
> on
> > any of the others?
>
> As above. If you know of any I'd appreciate it if
> you'd let me have a copy.
> However there is a benefit in looking at the
> cartouche in isolation.
>
>
> >
> > Do they indicate that the "painter" was
> different
> > (style, brush, handedness etc) than the
> Campbell's
> > cartouche? If so, how do they differ? If the
> same
> > "forger" or "hoaxer" why did they bother with
> all
> > the others?
>
> There is a variation in style, brush, hand.

You advised above that you had no access to photographs of the cartouches and writing in other chambers, but then declare "variation in style, brush, hand". Impossible for you to determine. Are you just trying to bluff and make up BS! Is BS what Creighton asked you for?


>
>
> > Were they merely practicing for the final
> gotcha
> > cartouche?
>
>
> I don't know. I can only comment on the physical
> relationship of the materials.
>
> In your expert opinion would it not be
> > not more difficult to forge unfamiliar writing
> > (hieratic) upside down?
>
> No. How would the forger know what was the
> correct orientation?


I think poster EyeofHorus has already addressed the issue. A forger would have no reason to attempt to paint them upside down. Nor in 1837 would they be significantly skilled in hieratic to be capable of doing it.
The point,is that it is no good being an art expert when the issue is authenticity of ancient AE handwriting.


>
>
> >
> > In your expert opinion, if all that a forger
> > needed was a "Khufu" cartouche, then would it
> not
> > been easier to paint it in an upright
> horizontal
> > manner on a vertical wall in a lower chamber?
> If
> > not, then ...why not?
>
> Again can't answer I can only comment on the
> physicality of the artwork and the way in which it
> was constructed.


But you provide no reasons (supporting information) whatsoever... as to why you think they were 'painted' that way or even how?
>



> >
> > What is the advantage of having to contort
> oneself
> > into a Michelangelo pose and attempt a forgery
> on
> > an angled gable roof?
>
> Again I cannot comment on motive only the artwork
> itself.

So your independent research and expertise simply amounts to a guess based on your bias?

How is that video coming along?


>
>
>
> >
> > Edit to add: Asking did you study in your
> highly
> > admirable art degrees how to paint deep into
> > concealed crevices in multi ton block
> structures?
> > Can you tell us the technical procedure for
> that?
>
> Access the crevices and then apply paint, usually
> using a brush.

Is that what you learnt in Uni? Plain BS! How do you access such crevices attested to by many many eye witnesses who declare it impossible?



>
> > My appreciation for your expert opinion, in
> > advance.
> >
> > Cheers
>
> It's been a pleasure.
> I particularly like discussing Monet, and the
> relationship between physics and art.
> Bloody marvelous.

It is obvious you know more than a thing or too about art and impressionists in particular.

What I am yet to ascertain is whether you know anything that would qualify you as an expert or even a real researcher into painted hieratic ?

It seems Lover's "gargantuan ego's" comment seems apt to the reason for any actual consent to be cited in SC book?

Yes a pleasure ... bloody marvellous!

But can you address the questions this time?


Cheers

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Who Was Khufu? 4824 loveritas 02-Jun-16 07:27
Non Noh-Suphis 1099 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Jun-16 15:31
Re: Who Was Khufu? 949 Thunderbird 02-Jun-16 17:10
Re: Oldest mines and Red ochre 825 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Who Was Khufu? 884 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 22:18
Re: Who Was Khufu? 848 loveritas 03-Jun-16 05:00
Hidden Agenda 802 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Jun-16 14:32
Re: Hidden Agenda 766 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Hidden Agenda 803 Dr. Troglodyte 04-Jun-16 00:05
Re:Co Regents ? 778 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 709 loveritas 04-Jun-16 00:24
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 810 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 01:55
The Power 775 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:40
Re: The Power 858 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:26
Re: The Power 832 Warwick 04-Jun-16 18:47
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1164 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:06
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 793 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:27
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 771 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:26
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1318 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 18:37
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 772 Warwick 05-Jun-16 18:51
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 834 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 20:12
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 764 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:25
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 790 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:35
Cartouche circle symbolizes a rope 713 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:30
Re: The Power 820 Martin Stower 14-Jun-16 09:36
Re: The Power 722 loveritas 21-Jun-16 11:19
Re: The Power 749 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 13:32
Re: The Power 791 Merrell 21-Jun-16 16:14
Re: The Power 757 loveritas 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: The Power 706 atul.seth 27-Jun-16 20:51
Re: Who Was Khufu? 806 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 02:42
The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 828 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 782 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:23
The Lepsius Tablet 747 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 17:20
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 784 loveritas 05-Jun-16 22:08
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 794 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 23:01
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 812 loveritas 05-Jun-16 23:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 977 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 09:16
Re: Who Was Khufu? 847 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 17:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 862 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:30
Re: Allegorical and historical 867 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 02:37
Re: Who Was Khufu? 789 Rofhessa 04-Jun-16 09:34
Re: Who Was Khufu? 826 Notinham 04-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Runic/Vinca? 808 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: Runic/Vince? 842 Notinham 04-Jun-16 04:38
Re: Runic/Vinca? 847 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Who Was Khufu? 735 Spiros 04-Jun-16 22:05
Re: Who Was Khufu? 736 Notinham 04-Jun-16 22:26
Re: Who Was Khufu? 833 Spiros 05-Jun-16 01:02
Re: Who Was Khufu? 748 Notinham 06-Jun-16 08:23
Hancock And The Quarry Marks 816 loveritas 05-Jun-16 03:22
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 770 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:32
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 733 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 09:58
Re: Who Was Khufu? 800 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 14:25
Re: Who Was Khufu? 775 eyeofhorus33 05-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Who Was Khufu? 770 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 07:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 828 Corpuscles 05-Jun-16 23:41
Schoch and the Quarry Marks 862 loveritas 06-Jun-16 01:17
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 813 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 891 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 02:57
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 766 loveritas 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 681 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:53
Re: Khufu Cartouche 964 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 05:47
Re: Khufu Cartouche 799 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 07:37
Re: Khufu Cartouche 892 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Khufu Cartouche 878 R Avry Wilson 07-Jun-16 05:24
Re: Khufu Cartouche 799 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 05:58
Re: Khufu Cartouche 819 Warwick 07-Jun-16 21:28
Re: Khufu Cartouche 664 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 22:12
Re: Khufu Cartouche 739 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:15
Re: Schoch and Maryann! 735 DScribr 23-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 663 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 13:56
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 727 Warwick 23-Jun-16 15:47
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 722 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 19:21
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 745 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 813 Corpuscles 06-Jun-16 03:55
Jury in Stunned Silence 1069 loveritas 12-Jun-16 03:14
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 902 Warwick 12-Jun-16 16:49
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 775 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 17:27
showing my age 754 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:01
Re: showing my age 755 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:27
Re: showing my age 740 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 19:49
Re: showing my age 755 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 18:51
Re: showing my age 691 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:09
Re: The red ochre marks 796 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 865 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 20:50
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 793 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 21:46
Re: Who Was Khufu? 792 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 09:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 776 Spiros 06-Jun-16 13:21
Re: Who Was Khufu? Khufwey was Yakov/Jacob? 867 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 02:53
Sphinx decoded 837 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 05:13
Re: 26th Dyn. ....Homage to Khufu 796 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 16:46
Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 856 loveritas 13-Jun-16 07:31
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 821 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 11:51
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 684 Thanos5150 13-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 653 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 17:49
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 758 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 781 Thunderbird 14-Jun-16 03:03
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 773 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 04:27
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 817 Thanos5150 14-Jun-16 05:33
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 707 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-16 17:55
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 835 Audrey 13-Jun-16 22:24
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 854 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 673 Morten 14-Jun-16 02:55
Science and the Conspiracy 753 loveritas 18-Jun-16 22:46
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 722 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 03:23
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 693 loveritas 19-Jun-16 04:39
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 822 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:57
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 688 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 07:38
Re: Khufu and..... Time 780 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 08:28
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 670 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:58
Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 777 loveritas 20-Jun-16 11:11
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 816 Thunderbird 20-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 684 Brian Patterson 20-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 844 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 19:47
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 878 Jon Ellison 20-Jun-16 20:05
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 800 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 773 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 00:08
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 783 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 776 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 01:12
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 837 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 798 Audrey 21-Jun-16 05:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 709 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:41
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 676 Corpuscles 21-Jun-16 03:58
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 713 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 686 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 14:18
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 691 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 781 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 874 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 759 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 17:24
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 710 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 752 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 664 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 725 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 755 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:00
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 724 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 16:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 768 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 730 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 801 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 17:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 713 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 657 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 684 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 18:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 669 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:29
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 691 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 20:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 794 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 21:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 761 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 22:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 644 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 710 Audrey 22-Jun-16 00:07
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 684 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 701 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 690 Audrey 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 699 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 726 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 675 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 695 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:30
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 772 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 621 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 744 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 02:35
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 673 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 667 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 674 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 792 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 12:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 718 Merrell 24-Jun-16 13:06
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 635 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 718 Audrey 24-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 642 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 19:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 707 Audrey 24-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 665 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:44
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 689 Audrey 24-Jun-16 22:58
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 603 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 576 Audrey 25-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 706 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 737 Audrey 25-Jun-16 03:15
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 722 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 21:23
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 646 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 21:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 676 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 22:00
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 621 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 658 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 693 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 23:34
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 758 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 752 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 00:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 773 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 646 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:25
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 662 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 06:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 739 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 12:23
Expert? Specialist? 715 Merrell 26-Jun-16 14:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 735 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 15:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 688 Merrell 26-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 595 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 677 Merrell 26-Jun-16 17:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 636 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 654 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 823 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 19:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 669 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 621 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 20:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 657 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 670 Corpuscles 27-Jun-16 00:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 735 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 07:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 710 Merrell 27-Jun-16 08:16
Re: Expert? Specialist? 776 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 08:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 673 DUNE 27-Jun-16 09:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 659 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 644 Merrell 27-Jun-16 09:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 712 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 739 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 707 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 14:53
Re: Expert? Specialist? 779 Merrell 27-Jun-16 15:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 610 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 750 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 568 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 719 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 00:23
Re: Expert? Specialist? 671 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 00:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 701 Audrey 28-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 671 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 13:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 635 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 13:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 605 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 14:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 660 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 02:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 632 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 16:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 649 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 631 Audrey 27-Jun-16 20:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 761 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 20:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 637 Audrey 27-Jun-16 21:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 589 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 21:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 654 Merrell 28-Jun-16 09:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 617 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 09:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 700 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 11:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 670 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 12:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 646 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 14:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 677 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 14:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 15:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 662 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 685 Merrell 28-Jun-16 15:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 608 Audrey 28-Jun-16 16:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 682 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 18:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 670 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 642 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 21:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 689 Audrey 28-Jun-16 19:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 742 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 01:35
Re: Expert? Specialist? 642 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 591 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 19:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 587 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 673 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 628 Merrell 28-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 635 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 677 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 701 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:42
Re: No parallel? 635 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 22:27
Re: No parallel? 623 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 659 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:49
Re: Expert? Specialist? 650 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 677 R Avry Wilson 28-Jun-16 19:31
Re: R Avery Wilson 597 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 20:47
Thanks, Brad 639 drrayeye 28-Jun-16 22:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Audrey 29-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Expert? Specialist? 595 R Avry Wilson 29-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 555 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 669 Thunderbird 29-Jun-16 06:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 606 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 595 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 608 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 569 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:33
Re: Expert? Specialist? 715 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 00:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 558 Audrey 30-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 562 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 03:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 550 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 498 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 510 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:29
Re: Expert? Specialist? 587 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 570 eyeofhorus33 30-Jun-16 06:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 647 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:37
Re: Ignore the evidence 632 Thunderbird 30-Jun-16 06:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 614 Audrey 30-Jun-16 04:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 646 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:34
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 616 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 612 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 569 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 23:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 591 Audrey 30-Jun-16 23:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 528 Martin Stower 30-Jun-16 23:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 613 Audrey 01-Jul-16 00:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 00:50
Re: Expert? Specialist? 511 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 636 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 539 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:57
Re: Expert? Specialist? 638 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 651 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 613 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 14:55
Please, Steven 637 drrayeye 01-Jul-16 00:44
Re: Please, Steven 620 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:19
Re: Please, Steven 675 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:56
Re: Please, Steven 722 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:24
Re: Please, Steven 574 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 15:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 581 Origyptian 26-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 649 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 592 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Expert? Specialist? 600 Merrell 27-Jun-16 07:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 616 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 13:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 530 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 13:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 608 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 570 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 576 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 567 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 682 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 617 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 649 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 21:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 687 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 22:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 592 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:21
Re: Expert? Specialist? 695 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 618 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 508 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 721 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Expert? Specialist? 548 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 580 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 21:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 591 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 574 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 17:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 681 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:51
Re: Gatekeeping 543 Thunderbird 27-Jun-16 16:38
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 654 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:54
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 794 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 598 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 658 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:18
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 650 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 571 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:31
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 670 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 585 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 578 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 650 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:23
No Moderator Conspiracy 594 loveritas 27-Jun-16 05:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 622 Morten 25-Jun-16 23:19
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 596 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 634 Audrey 25-Jun-16 23:51
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 549 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 681 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:49
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 716 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 553 DScribr 30-Jun-16 02:48
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 616 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 585 Merrell 26-Jun-16 13:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 563 Audrey 24-Jun-16 16:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 725 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:08
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 624 Audrey 24-Jun-16 20:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 705 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 740 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:59
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 672 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 11:38
Post o' the week! 616 DScribr 22-Jun-16 21:07
Summertime In England 652 loveritas 21-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Who Was Khufu? 702 DUNE 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 572 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:22
Re: Who Was Khufu? 727 DUNE 21-Jun-16 16:05
Re: Minute Examination 658 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Minute Examination 620 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:48
Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 775 loveritas 22-Jun-16 03:34
Re: Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 631 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 20:20
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 681 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:14
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 725 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 21:37
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 640 DScribr 23-Jun-16 23:00
Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 672 loveritas 22-Jun-16 23:20
Re: Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 725 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:57
Creighton's Legal Team In Hiding 744 loveritas 23-Jun-16 23:54
it all boils down to this 637 Warwick 25-Jun-16 19:21
How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 645 Corpuscles 25-Jun-16 23:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 676 Audrey 26-Jun-16 00:19
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 661 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:24
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 581 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:17
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 649 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 667 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:48
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 568 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:52
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 623 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:57
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 680 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:59
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 507 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 613 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 741 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:04
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 648 Audrey 26-Jun-16 04:47
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 677 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 13:49
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 608 Warwick 26-Jun-16 17:32
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 627 Corpuscles 26-Jun-16 07:01
Re: Who Was Khufu? 660 atul.seth 28-Jun-16 12:48
Re: Who Was Khufu? 642 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:13
Re: Who Was Khufu? 701 Howard West 28-Jun-16 15:37
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 641 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 16:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 637 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 18:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 586 wonderwall 28-Jun-16 20:52
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 648 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 21:22
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 727 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:46
Lackeys 695 loveritas 29-Jun-16 07:19
Re: Lackeys 666 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Lackeys 635 Corpuscles 29-Jun-16 09:41
Re: Lackeys 628 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 09:45
Re: Lackeys 572 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:52
Re: Lackeys 643 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:05
Oxymoron Alert 539 Warwick 29-Jun-16 16:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 609 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Oxymoron Alert 554 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Oxymoron Alert 599 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Oxymoron Alert 689 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 524 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Oxymoron Alert 523 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 18:59
Surely you Jest 587 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 19:59
Re: Surely you Jest 609 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:29
Re: Surely you Jest 587 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 20:48
Re: Oxymoron Alert 624 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:32
N/T 569 Merrell 01-Jul-16 17:22
Re: Oxymoron Alert 637 Warwick 29-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Oxymoron Alert 658 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:24
Say what? 637 Warwick 30-Jun-16 14:27
Re: Say what? 550 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:16
Re: Say what? 620 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:55
Re: Say what? 600 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 17:10
Re: Say what? 623 Warwick 01-Jul-16 17:28
Re: Say what? 674 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 15:26
Re: Say what? 613 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:51
The Lackey Called John Snape 556 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:14
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 583 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 11:38
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 683 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:55
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 557 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 12:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 583 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:16
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 681 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:33
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 557 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:47
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 667 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:58
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 536 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:09
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 684 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:28
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 593 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 620 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 579 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 17:10
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 647 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:30
Re: Lackeys 613 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Lackeys 585 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:08
Re: Lackeys 646 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:31
Re: Lackeys 529 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: Lackeys 533 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Lackeys 613 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Lackeys 527 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Lackeys 620 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 18:46
Re: Lackeys 608 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Lackeys 639 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 19:19
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 650 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 12:40
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 630 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 13:35
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 532 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:38
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 533 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 14:42
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 606 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 15:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 644 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:50
'Officially' in the gutter. 666 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:16
Scotts 'New" Book 684 DScribr 29-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 623 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:27
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 553 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 14:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 607 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:44
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 618 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 578 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:57
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 607 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 569 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:14
n/t 601 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:59
The Need For Proof. 590 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:56
Re: The Need For Proof. 641 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:00
Hypocrisy 655 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:10
Re: Hypocrisy 576 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:19
Re: Hypocrisy 587 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:56
Re: Hypocrisy 545 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Hypocrisy 596 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Hypocrisy 621 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:36
Re: Hypocrisy 562 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 22:21
Re: Hypocrisy 582 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Hypocrisy 522 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:53
Re: Hypocrisy denied, but..... 641 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:50
Re: Hypocrisy 600 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 570 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:49
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 553 cladking 29-Jun-16 03:48
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 641 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 05:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 515 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.