Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DScribr Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > IT WAS YOU who started w/ the 'we have no
> reason
> > to believe', or have you forgotten you posted
> this
> > a mere 6 hrs. ago???
> >
> > ".....If Brewer truly was a conscientious man
> with
> > an excellent visual memory, as your careful
> > examination seems to have revealed, he wouldn't
> > have any reason to document what he saw in the
> > first place. I mean, ***we have no reason to
> > believe*** that Brewer ever intended to blow
> the
> > whistle publicly on Vyse, or that he would ever
> > need to creating an enduring record of what he
> > experienced during his alleged gainful
> employment
> > under Vyse...."
> >
> >
> > NO sense in 'trying to impose' reason on you
> > either.
>
>
> You are mixing two different issues.
>
> My post was referring to Brewer. Since we have no
> firsthand account or any other physical evidence
> from Brewer, on what possible basis may we
> preferentially believe he had this vs. that
> intention? You called that a "common-sense post".
>
>
> On the other hand, you were just talking about
> whether the G1 glyphs were forged. That's a
> completely different issue that has a lot of
> physical evidence associated with it, and that
> evidence by no means makes it clear that those
> glyphs are original to the construction of G1.
>
> I stand by my comments. Thanks for letting me
> clarify.




I'm NOT mixing anything, I was pointing out your hypocrisy regarding your earlier statement.

You're welcome.