Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Origyptian Wrote:
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > > You are mixing two different issues.
> > >
> > > No, he’s not. He got you fair and square.
> He
> > > echoed your phrase.
> > >
> > > You don’t know what information other
> people
> > > have about Brewer. Your claim about what
> “we”
> > > have is as questionable as his.
> > >
> > > To which I might add, that there is no reason
> for
> > > you to believe which is not reason for
> everyone to
> > > believe.
> > >
> > > We do have reason to believe that Brewer
> would
> > > behave and react in certain ways, in the
> conduct
> > > attributed to him by the story and in what we
> can
> > > learn of him historically.
> > >
> > > By all means bring forward your “plenty of
> > > reason” to doubt which has not already been
> > > aired and is not already part of what
> “we”
> > > have to go on.
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> > Now you're the one who is not
> > understanding English.
> > Two completely different issues.
>
> Which have nothing to do with the point. Pure red
> herring.
>
> The point is that your claim is as questionable as
> his. You don’t know that no one knows more than
> you do about Brewer. You don’t know what
> “we” know.
>
> M.


Well excuse me for not divining that I was excluded from the "we" clique when the comment was a reply to my post.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 29-Jun-16 22:03 by Origyptian.