Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DScribr Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > IT WAS YOU who started w/ the 'we have no reason
> > to believe', or have you forgotten you posted this
> > a mere 6 hrs. ago???
> >
> > ".....If Brewer truly was a conscientious man with
> > an excellent visual memory, as your careful
> > examination seems to have revealed, he wouldn't
> > have any reason to document what he saw in the
> > first place. I mean, ***we have no reason to
> > believe*** that Brewer ever intended to blow the
> > whistle publicly on Vyse, or that he would ever
> > need to creating an enduring record of what he
> > experienced during his alleged gainful employment
> > under Vyse...."
> >
> >
> > NO sense in 'trying to impose' reason on you
> > either.
>
>
> You are mixing two different issues.

No, he’s not. He got you fair and square. He echoed your phrase.

You don’t know what information other people have about Brewer. Your claim about what “we” have is as questionable as his.

To which I might add, that there is no reason for you to believe which is not reason for everyone to believe.

We do have reason to believe that Brewer would behave and react in certain ways, in the conduct attributed to him by the story and in what we can learn of him historically.

By all means bring forward your “plenty of reason” to doubt which has not already been aired and is not already part of what “we” have to go on.

M.