DScribr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> IT WAS YOU who started w/ the 'we have no reason
> to believe', or have you forgotten you posted this
> a mere 6 hrs. ago???
>
> ".....If Brewer truly was a conscientious man with
> an excellent visual memory, as your careful
> examination seems to have revealed, he wouldn't
> have any reason to document what he saw in the
> first place. I mean, ***we have no reason to
> believe*** that Brewer ever intended to blow the
> whistle publicly on Vyse, or that he would ever
> need to creating an enduring record of what he
> experienced during his alleged gainful employment
> under Vyse...."
>
>
> NO sense in 'trying to impose' reason on you
> either.


You are mixing two different issues.

My post was referring to Brewer. Since we have no firsthand account or any other physical evidence from Brewer, on what possible basis may we preferentially believe he had this vs. that intention? You called that a "common-sense post".

On the other hand, you were just talking about whether the G1 glyphs were forged. That's a completely different issue that has a lot of physical evidence associated with it, and that evidence by no means makes it clear that those glyphs are original to the construction of G1.

I stand by my comments. Thanks for letting me clarify.