Audrey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote: to Jon
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Is that confirmation that you deny Creighton
> had
> > the (any) dignity to ask permission to
> use
> > your real name, and provide an explanation of
> how
> > and advance draft of the full context in which
> > your "independent researcher and art expert"
> tag
> > was to be used?
>
> > Yes or NO?
>
> How is that any of your business?
> I think you all are jealous that you've not been
> included in someone's book.
>
> > You are the one challenging Lover's (and
> others)
> > careful reading of what you ALREADY have
> posted,
> > and multi edited, apparently on a "smart" phone
> > whilst weaving in British traffic!
>
> So call the police. How do you know he wasn't the
> passenger? Or stopped at a light?
> Can you find nothing else to bitch about?
>
> > Is that imaginary distraction of a dog,
> difficult
> > to stop it lickin' n' jumpin' on ya lap?
>
> I knew you hadn't changed. Same old obnoxious
> crude poster you always were
>
> > PS Is there a chance you missed Creighton's
> plea
> > to include you in the official list of
> crackpots?
>
> The only crackpots here are the ones who have
> nothing but resentment for a higher education,
> jealousy for not being consulted for a book, and
> just an overall evil need to tear down others who
> they view as being above their class. You cannot
> talk about Vyse, Brewer or cartouches, so you
> result to low class bar room insults. It happens
> every time.
>
> You cannot tear down Scott's book by using crass
> Neanderthal insults against those mentioned in his
> book. You will fail. The book will be published
> and read no matter what you guys say. Deal with
> it.
>
> Do unto others Corp....... do you really want the
> same given back to you?


How can one be , Jealous of those with a higher education, while at the same time disappointed that their knowledge(ie the sum of their education)is not being referenced by those same people?

Apparently I was referenced in Scott's 1st book. I don't know if this is true or not. I do know that if it is true I was never consulted. If it is true and I was cited out Of Context, I would be offended. If it is true and I was cited In Context I would be complimented.

Just how far are we going to go down this Obfuscation trail?


Warwick