Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> > > Of course a conscientious man, being a
> > > conscientious man, caring enough (we’re
> told) to
> > > have a “dispute” with Raven and Hill and
> > > “words” with Hill and Vyse, would have
> reason
> > > blow the whistle on Vyse and to record what
> he’d
> > > observed for the benefit of posterity.
> >
> > Or, it's quite possible that not everyone is as
> > publicly vindictive as you assume they are.
>
> Why is it that you focus instantly on a notion of
> vindictiveness and not the concern for truth with
> which the story credits him?
>
> M.
What "truth"? How can anyone possibly know the truth about Brewer? Why are you harping on this. Just make the statement that there's no documentation from the alleged eyewitness and therefore it can't be proven. Period.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> > > Of course a conscientious man, being a
> > > conscientious man, caring enough (we’re
> told) to
> > > have a “dispute” with Raven and Hill and
> > > “words” with Hill and Vyse, would have
> reason
> > > blow the whistle on Vyse and to record what
> he’d
> > > observed for the benefit of posterity.
> >
> > Or, it's quite possible that not everyone is as
> > publicly vindictive as you assume they are.
>
> Why is it that you focus instantly on a notion of
> vindictiveness and not the concern for truth with
> which the story credits him?
>
> M.
What "truth"? How can anyone possibly know the truth about Brewer? Why are you harping on this. Just make the statement that there's no documentation from the alleged eyewitness and therefore it can't be proven. Period.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.