Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> > ----------
> >
> > > You sad man.
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> > The only thing that makes me sad here is that
> > Graham Hancock's standard for scholarly
> discourse
> > is now officially in the gutter.
>
> And yet again we have the exemplary scholarly
> honesty of falsifying the quote.
>
> Let’s run through that again:
>
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Origyptian Wrote:
> > > >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > > And thanks to Stower, I do intend to buy
> Scott's
> > > > book.
> > >
> > > To take a dig at me? You sad man.
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> > The only thing that makes me sad here is that
> > Graham Hancock's standard for scholarly
> discourse
> > is now officially in the gutter.
>
> Now we see why I wrote what I wrote: Femano’s
> unscholarly dig at me and the silly and
> unscholarly “reason” he gives for his stated
> intention to buy Creighton’s book.
>
> Here we have two things: (1) his false pretence
> that his posts are purely scholarly and
> unobjectionable, and (2) his very unscholarly
> misrepresentation of what I wrote.
>
> Poor Femano, always sinned against, never sinning,
> never taking responsibility for what he has done
> to harm discussion on this board—starting with
> parading his irrelevant doctorate, with the
> results we see now in the present mad round of
> (largely vicarious) qualification-waving,

The veracity of my qualifications in support of Scott Creighton's analyses of an artwork were questioned by members of this board.
Those qualifications have now been clearly declared openly on this board.
Namely.
Master of Arts, Art and Design. With Merit
Bachelor of Arts, Art and Design. 2-1

Both degrees awarded by a fully accredited UK university. The University of Portsmouth.
I trust that the above will no longer be in question.

entirely
> inappropriate on a board where the participants
> are of necessity usually amateurs in the topics
> discussed and a battle the fringe has lost from
> the outset.

Unless of course those qualifications are questioned by members of this board.
In which case disclosure is necessary.

If there are any further questions relating to my academic qualifications I will be pleased to answer so long as internet security, or any danger of identity theft is not compromised.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 29-Jun-16 15:19 by Jon Ellison.