Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > No, John, they use me as a source of arguments
> and
> > > they acknowledge me as the source of these
> > > arguments. They present the arguments and
> leave
> > > the rest to the reader. They do not call me
> an
> > > “expert” and there is no appeal to
> authority
> > > (as noted below)—whereas you’ve made it
> > > abundantly clear here that an appeal to
> authority
> > > is precisely what Creighton has produced and
> this
> > > is how you see it yourself.
> >
> > Which is exactly what Scott has done ..
>
> Thanks for confirming.
>
> [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_a
> uthority]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_fr
> om_authority[/url]
>
> > He's identified and recognised an "expert". The
> > one and only "expert" in the field as far as I
> am
> > aware. (myself)
> > The expertise and method has been described,
> > leaving the "ordinary reader" free to carry out
> > their own analyses and draw there own
> conclusions.
>
> Well, John, if you’re the [i]one and only
> “expert” in the field[/i], who exactly is it
> who’s validating your expertise? Yourself?
> Creighton?
>
> Where may we find your published work on the
> topic? Where may we find your name so much as
> mentioned in connection with it? And yet the
> phrase is out there and it’s
> [i]archaeologists[/i] talking about it:
>
> [url=https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22brush+st
> roke+sequencing%22]https://www.google.co.uk/search
> ?q=%22brush+stroke+sequencing%22[/url]
>
> Looks like you need to get out there and stake
> your claim.
>
> > Time and time again we say carry out your own
> > analyses and draw your own conclusions.
> > How many times do we need to repeat it?
>
> We?
>
> > > Fully credentialed and degreed expert in
> brush
> > > stroke sequencing!
> >
> > The FIRST and ONLY fully degreed expert in
> brush
> > stroke sequencing in this field. The practice
> of
> > sequencing of brush strokes.
>
> So you keep saying. See above.
>
> > It seems that Egyptology has failed to identify
> > this analytical process.
>
> But archaeology has. See above.
>
> > I did.
> > Which I'm fully prepared to share, so that
> > "ordinary readers" can carry out their own
> > analyses and draw their own conclusions.
>
> So let’s see your dissertation, thesis,
> whatever. If not the full thing, the references
> or bibliography would be a start.
>
> > > Most of us have worked this stuff out before
> the
> > > age of five,
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 52112,1055762#msg-1055762&v=t]remember[/url]?—an
> d you’re trying to con us that it’s
> > > specialised, esoteric knowledge which
> requires
> > > credentials to comment on?
> > >
> > > So, will you be showing us your published work
> on
> > > [i]brush stroke sequencing[/i] in the work of
> > > Roger Hilton (say)?
> > >
> > > Will you be showing us some of your
> paintings?
> >
> > Why? What do my paintings have to do with
> > anything?
>
> Well, duh. It would show us that you know
> something about brush work. All we have so far is
> your saying so.
>
> I notice you’ve bypassed the bit about published
> work. When may we expect to see it?
>
> > > Past time for “the emperor has no clothes”
> on
> > > this one.
> >
> > Ridiculous statement. The "clothes" have been
> > demonstrated in the methodology.
> > The "clothes" have been freely given away and
> are
> > free for anyone who cares to use them.
>
> The methodology I’ve seen so far includes blurry
> enlargements and comments on my eyesight. Is this
> the kind of thing you submitted in fulfilment of
> the requirements of your degree?
>
> > > And, let me remind you, Scott Creighton has
> no
> > > credentials in any of the stuff he talks
> about.
> >
> > Were talking about ME, the one and only expert
> in
> > brush stroke sequencing. Scott had the
> > intelligence to seek expert advice on issues
> > outside of his knowledge base and field.
> > A fact which is being fully and ably
> demonstrated
> > here by yourself. He sought the advice of an
> > expert.
>
> No, John, the comment being answered was about me
> and my credentials.
>
> It’s not all about you, you know.
>
> > > > > What credentials does Graham Hancock have
> which
> > > > > make his opinion believable?
> > > >
> > > > Again Graham Hancock actively and constantly
> seeks
> > > > the advice of credentialed experts and
> > > > specialists.
> > >
> > > I’ve done some of that myself.
> >
> > Good for you ..
>
> Yes, John, it’s good for me and it more than
> meets your standard, as you think it merits praise
> when Scott seeks advice from people who just
> happen to be on the same message board.
>
> > > As for Graham Hancock, would you like to give
> an
> > > example? He’s clearly selective in which
> > > experts and specialists he believes and which
> not.
> > > What credentials does he have to make this
> > > choice?
> >
> > The professional integrity of GH is not the
> issue
> > here.
>
> And you’ve missed the point.
>
> > > If the books are just compilations of what
> > > credentialed experts and specialists say,
> > > where’s the room for Graham Hancock?
> >
> > Who said they were .. JUST....
>
> And you’ve missed the point.
>
> > > Who, let me remind you, has no credentials in
> any
> > > of the stuff he talks about. Pretty dumb to
> do
> > > this huffing and puffing about credentials on
> > > Graham Hancock’s Message Board!
> >
> > Not relevant..
>
> Says you, having missed the point.
>
> > > But John, most of us have applied paint with
> a
> > > brush by the age of five! Remember?
> >
> > Yes straightforward and easy to understand
> isn't
> > it? Beautiful simplicity.
>
> So much for the specialised knowledge and “one
> and only expert in the field”.
>
> > Which begs the question why hasn't Egyptology
> and
> > those such as yourself not already recognised
> it
> > and were totally unaware of it until I was
> > gracious enough to bring it to your attention.
>
> On the contrary, John, you brought nothing to my
> attention which I wouldn’t regard as
> platitudinous or wrong.
>
> What begs the question is your assumption that
> “Egyptology” hasn’t. Archaeology has, as
> noted above.
>
> > > Heard of palaeography? You think you have
> > > anything on specialists in hieratic or
> demotic?
> >
> > This has nothing at all to do with the reading
> of
> > signs and symbols.
> > It is totally about the physical process of the
> > application of paint to a surface... Painting..
>
> LOL! You don’t know what I’m talking about,
> do you?
>
> > > > They sought his expertise in that field and
> > > > proclaimed so.
> > >
> > > BS.
> > >
> > > Quote please.
> >
> > Page 101 "Giza the Truth"
>
> Hardback or paperback—and where’s the quote?
>
> M.

All total pointless deflective bunkum typical of Stower.

If anyone would like to seriously discuss the technicalities of this methodology, "The sequential analyses of mark making" I may at some point in the future run a thread.
Scott Creighton may or may not include a section with regard to the contentious cartouche in his forthcoming book. We will just have to wait and see.
In the meantime I think the basic principles have been well enough described, and as I have stated on numerous occasions the "ordinary reader" should have little difficulty in carrying out a basic analyses for him or herself, and further be able to form their own conclusions.
The process application is not at all complex. It was simply a question of someone with the appropriate experience and education to identify it. Which in this case was me.
The photographs are readily available online. They are of more than adequate spatial resolution and bit depth for these purposes and using images from three totally independent platforms taken over a decade or so negates any possibility of optical or electronic distortion or interference.

Those opposed to the idea of "ordinary readers" using this analytical tool in order to carry out their own analyses and therefore forming their own conclusions may well have a vested interest in adopting that stance for reasons known only to themselves.

Mission accomplished.

Good luck and have fun.
J.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 28-Jun-16 15:30 by Jon Ellison.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Who Was Khufu? 4821 loveritas 02-Jun-16 07:27
Non Noh-Suphis 1097 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Jun-16 15:31
Re: Who Was Khufu? 947 Thunderbird 02-Jun-16 17:10
Re: Oldest mines and Red ochre 823 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Who Was Khufu? 880 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 22:18
Re: Who Was Khufu? 847 loveritas 03-Jun-16 05:00
Hidden Agenda 801 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Jun-16 14:32
Re: Hidden Agenda 765 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Hidden Agenda 801 Dr. Troglodyte 04-Jun-16 00:05
Re:Co Regents ? 776 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 707 loveritas 04-Jun-16 00:24
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 809 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 01:55
The Power 774 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:40
Re: The Power 857 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:26
Re: The Power 831 Warwick 04-Jun-16 18:47
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1159 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:06
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 792 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:27
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 768 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:26
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1316 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 18:37
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 771 Warwick 05-Jun-16 18:51
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 831 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 20:12
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 761 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:25
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 788 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:35
Cartouche circle symbolizes a rope 712 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:30
Re: The Power 819 Martin Stower 14-Jun-16 09:36
Re: The Power 721 loveritas 21-Jun-16 11:19
Re: The Power 745 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 13:32
Re: The Power 790 Merrell 21-Jun-16 16:14
Re: The Power 755 loveritas 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: The Power 704 atul.seth 27-Jun-16 20:51
Re: Who Was Khufu? 804 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 02:42
The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 826 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 781 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:23
The Lepsius Tablet 745 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 17:20
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 782 loveritas 05-Jun-16 22:08
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 792 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 23:01
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 811 loveritas 05-Jun-16 23:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 975 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 09:16
Re: Who Was Khufu? 844 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 17:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 861 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:30
Re: Allegorical and historical 864 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 02:37
Re: Who Was Khufu? 787 Rofhessa 04-Jun-16 09:34
Re: Who Was Khufu? 824 Notinham 04-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Runic/Vinca? 805 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: Runic/Vince? 841 Notinham 04-Jun-16 04:38
Re: Runic/Vinca? 845 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Who Was Khufu? 731 Spiros 04-Jun-16 22:05
Re: Who Was Khufu? 734 Notinham 04-Jun-16 22:26
Re: Who Was Khufu? 831 Spiros 05-Jun-16 01:02
Re: Who Was Khufu? 747 Notinham 06-Jun-16 08:23
Hancock And The Quarry Marks 814 loveritas 05-Jun-16 03:22
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 768 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:32
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 732 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 09:58
Re: Who Was Khufu? 799 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 14:25
Re: Who Was Khufu? 772 eyeofhorus33 05-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Who Was Khufu? 768 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 07:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 827 Corpuscles 05-Jun-16 23:41
Schoch and the Quarry Marks 859 loveritas 06-Jun-16 01:17
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 809 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 889 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 02:57
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 763 loveritas 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 678 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:53
Re: Khufu Cartouche 962 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 05:47
Re: Khufu Cartouche 798 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 07:37
Re: Khufu Cartouche 891 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Khufu Cartouche 876 R Avry Wilson 07-Jun-16 05:24
Re: Khufu Cartouche 797 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 05:58
Re: Khufu Cartouche 816 Warwick 07-Jun-16 21:28
Re: Khufu Cartouche 662 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 22:12
Re: Khufu Cartouche 737 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:15
Re: Schoch and Maryann! 733 DScribr 23-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 662 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 13:56
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 726 Warwick 23-Jun-16 15:47
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 719 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 19:21
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 744 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 812 Corpuscles 06-Jun-16 03:55
Jury in Stunned Silence 1066 loveritas 12-Jun-16 03:14
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 901 Warwick 12-Jun-16 16:49
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 773 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 17:27
showing my age 751 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:01
Re: showing my age 753 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:27
Re: showing my age 738 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 19:49
Re: showing my age 753 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 18:51
Re: showing my age 689 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:09
Re: The red ochre marks 794 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 863 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 20:50
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 791 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 21:46
Re: Who Was Khufu? 790 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 09:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 774 Spiros 06-Jun-16 13:21
Re: Who Was Khufu? Khufwey was Yakov/Jacob? 865 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 02:53
Sphinx decoded 835 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 05:13
Re: 26th Dyn. ....Homage to Khufu 795 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 16:46
Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 855 loveritas 13-Jun-16 07:31
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 819 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 11:51
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 682 Thanos5150 13-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 650 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 17:49
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 756 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 779 Thunderbird 14-Jun-16 03:03
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 772 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 04:27
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 814 Thanos5150 14-Jun-16 05:33
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 706 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-16 17:55
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 834 Audrey 13-Jun-16 22:24
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 851 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 671 Morten 14-Jun-16 02:55
Science and the Conspiracy 752 loveritas 18-Jun-16 22:46
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 721 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 03:23
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 693 loveritas 19-Jun-16 04:39
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 820 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:57
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 685 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 07:38
Re: Khufu and..... Time 779 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 08:28
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 669 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:58
Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 776 loveritas 20-Jun-16 11:11
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 816 Thunderbird 20-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 684 Brian Patterson 20-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 843 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 19:47
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 877 Jon Ellison 20-Jun-16 20:05
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 800 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 773 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 00:08
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 780 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 776 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 01:12
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 834 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 797 Audrey 21-Jun-16 05:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 709 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:41
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 674 Corpuscles 21-Jun-16 03:58
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 713 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 685 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 14:18
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 690 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 780 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 872 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 757 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 17:24
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 708 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 751 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 664 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 724 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 755 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:00
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 722 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 16:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 767 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 729 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 800 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 17:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 711 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 657 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 683 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 18:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 668 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:29
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 688 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 20:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 794 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 21:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 760 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 22:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 643 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 709 Audrey 22-Jun-16 00:07
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 683 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 700 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 690 Audrey 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 699 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 725 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 675 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 694 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:30
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 770 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 621 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 744 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 02:35
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 672 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 666 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 672 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 791 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 12:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 716 Merrell 24-Jun-16 13:06
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 633 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 717 Audrey 24-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 640 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 19:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 706 Audrey 24-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 663 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:44
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 689 Audrey 24-Jun-16 22:58
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 601 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 576 Audrey 25-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 706 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 734 Audrey 25-Jun-16 03:15
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 720 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 21:23
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 645 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 21:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 676 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 22:00
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 620 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 658 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 690 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 23:34
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 757 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 751 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 00:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 772 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 645 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:25
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 662 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 06:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 738 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 12:23
Expert? Specialist? 714 Merrell 26-Jun-16 14:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 733 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 15:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 687 Merrell 26-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 594 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 676 Merrell 26-Jun-16 17:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 634 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 653 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 823 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 19:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 667 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 20:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 657 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 669 Corpuscles 27-Jun-16 00:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 735 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 07:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 709 Merrell 27-Jun-16 08:16
Re: Expert? Specialist? 776 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 08:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 671 DUNE 27-Jun-16 09:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 658 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 644 Merrell 27-Jun-16 09:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 710 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 739 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 706 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 14:53
Re: Expert? Specialist? 779 Merrell 27-Jun-16 15:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 610 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 749 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 566 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 719 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 00:23
Re: Expert? Specialist? 671 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 00:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 700 Audrey 28-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 670 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 13:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 635 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 13:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 605 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 14:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 658 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 02:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 631 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 16:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 648 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 629 Audrey 27-Jun-16 20:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 761 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 20:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 636 Audrey 27-Jun-16 21:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 589 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 21:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 654 Merrell 28-Jun-16 09:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 617 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 09:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 700 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 11:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 669 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 12:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 644 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 14:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 676 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 14:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 15:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 661 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 684 Merrell 28-Jun-16 15:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 607 Audrey 28-Jun-16 16:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 678 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 18:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 669 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 642 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 21:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 689 Audrey 28-Jun-16 19:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 742 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 01:35
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 591 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 19:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 585 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 672 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 628 Merrell 28-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 635 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 677 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 700 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:42
Re: No parallel? 634 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 22:27
Re: No parallel? 623 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 657 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:49
Re: Expert? Specialist? 649 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 676 R Avry Wilson 28-Jun-16 19:31
Re: R Avery Wilson 597 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 20:47
Thanks, Brad 639 drrayeye 28-Jun-16 22:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 619 Audrey 29-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Expert? Specialist? 594 R Avry Wilson 29-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 553 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 669 Thunderbird 29-Jun-16 06:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 605 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 594 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 606 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 568 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:33
Re: Expert? Specialist? 715 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 00:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 558 Audrey 30-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 561 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 03:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 548 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 497 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 509 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:29
Re: Expert? Specialist? 587 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 570 eyeofhorus33 30-Jun-16 06:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 646 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:37
Re: Ignore the evidence 630 Thunderbird 30-Jun-16 06:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 613 Audrey 30-Jun-16 04:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 646 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:34
Re: Expert? Specialist? 640 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 615 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 611 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 569 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 23:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 590 Audrey 30-Jun-16 23:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 527 Martin Stower 30-Jun-16 23:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 612 Audrey 01-Jul-16 00:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 617 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 00:50
Re: Expert? Specialist? 511 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 634 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 539 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:57
Re: Expert? Specialist? 638 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 650 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 613 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 14:55
Please, Steven 636 drrayeye 01-Jul-16 00:44
Re: Please, Steven 619 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:19
Re: Please, Steven 674 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:56
Re: Please, Steven 722 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:24
Re: Please, Steven 573 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 15:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 581 Origyptian 26-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 648 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 590 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Expert? Specialist? 599 Merrell 27-Jun-16 07:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 615 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 13:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 530 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 13:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 607 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 570 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 575 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 566 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 682 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 616 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 649 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 21:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 686 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 22:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 591 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:21
Re: Expert? Specialist? 694 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 617 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 618 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 507 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 721 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Expert? Specialist? 546 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 579 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 21:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 590 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 572 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 17:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 680 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:51
Re: Gatekeeping 542 Thunderbird 27-Jun-16 16:38
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 651 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:54
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 793 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 597 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 656 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:18
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 648 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 571 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:31
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 668 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 585 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 577 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 650 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:23
No Moderator Conspiracy 594 loveritas 27-Jun-16 05:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 621 Morten 25-Jun-16 23:19
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 595 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 633 Audrey 25-Jun-16 23:51
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 549 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 681 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:49
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 716 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 552 DScribr 30-Jun-16 02:48
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 615 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 583 Merrell 26-Jun-16 13:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 562 Audrey 24-Jun-16 16:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 725 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:08
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 623 Audrey 24-Jun-16 20:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 704 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 738 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:59
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 671 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 11:38
Post o' the week! 613 DScribr 22-Jun-16 21:07
Summertime In England 651 loveritas 21-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Who Was Khufu? 701 DUNE 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 571 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:22
Re: Who Was Khufu? 726 DUNE 21-Jun-16 16:05
Re: Minute Examination 656 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Minute Examination 617 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:48
Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 772 loveritas 22-Jun-16 03:34
Re: Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 629 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 20:20
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 680 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:14
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 723 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 21:37
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 639 DScribr 23-Jun-16 23:00
Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 671 loveritas 22-Jun-16 23:20
Re: Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 724 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:57
Creighton's Legal Team In Hiding 742 loveritas 23-Jun-16 23:54
it all boils down to this 635 Warwick 25-Jun-16 19:21
How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 642 Corpuscles 25-Jun-16 23:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 674 Audrey 26-Jun-16 00:19
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 659 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:24
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 580 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:17
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 648 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 665 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:48
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 567 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:52
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 620 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:57
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 678 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:59
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 506 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 611 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 739 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:04
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 646 Audrey 26-Jun-16 04:47
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 674 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 13:49
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 606 Warwick 26-Jun-16 17:32
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 624 Corpuscles 26-Jun-16 07:01
Re: Who Was Khufu? 658 atul.seth 28-Jun-16 12:48
Re: Who Was Khufu? 640 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:13
Re: Who Was Khufu? 700 Howard West 28-Jun-16 15:37
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 638 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 16:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 635 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 18:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 584 wonderwall 28-Jun-16 20:52
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 647 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 21:22
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 724 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:46
Lackeys 694 loveritas 29-Jun-16 07:19
Re: Lackeys 663 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Lackeys 634 Corpuscles 29-Jun-16 09:41
Re: Lackeys 627 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 09:45
Re: Lackeys 571 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:52
Re: Lackeys 642 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:05
Oxymoron Alert 538 Warwick 29-Jun-16 16:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 608 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Oxymoron Alert 552 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Oxymoron Alert 597 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Oxymoron Alert 688 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 523 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Oxymoron Alert 522 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 18:59
Surely you Jest 585 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 19:59
Re: Surely you Jest 608 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:29
Re: Surely you Jest 586 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 20:48
Re: Oxymoron Alert 621 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:32
N/T 567 Merrell 01-Jul-16 17:22
Re: Oxymoron Alert 634 Warwick 29-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Oxymoron Alert 656 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:24
Say what? 634 Warwick 30-Jun-16 14:27
Re: Say what? 546 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:16
Re: Say what? 619 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:55
Re: Say what? 599 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 17:10
Re: Say what? 622 Warwick 01-Jul-16 17:28
Re: Say what? 673 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 15:26
Re: Say what? 610 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:51
The Lackey Called John Snape 555 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:14
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 582 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 11:38
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 681 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:55
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 555 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 12:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 579 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:16
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 679 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:33
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 556 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:47
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 665 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:58
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 535 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:09
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 680 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:28
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 592 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 619 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 577 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 17:10
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 645 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:30
Re: Lackeys 611 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Lackeys 583 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:08
Re: Lackeys 645 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:31
Re: Lackeys 527 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: Lackeys 530 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Lackeys 612 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Lackeys 525 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Lackeys 619 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 18:46
Re: Lackeys 607 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Lackeys 636 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 19:19
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 649 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 12:40
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 628 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 13:35
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 530 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:38
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 531 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 14:42
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 605 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 15:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 642 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:50
'Officially' in the gutter. 663 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:16
Scotts 'New" Book 683 DScribr 29-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 621 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:27
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 552 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 14:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 606 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:44
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 615 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 577 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:57
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 606 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 567 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:14
n/t 600 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:59
The Need For Proof. 588 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:56
Re: The Need For Proof. 639 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:00
Hypocrisy 654 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:10
Re: Hypocrisy 575 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:19
Re: Hypocrisy 586 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:56
Re: Hypocrisy 542 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Hypocrisy 593 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Hypocrisy 620 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:36
Re: Hypocrisy 561 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 22:21
Re: Hypocrisy 581 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Hypocrisy 520 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:53
Re: Hypocrisy denied, but..... 639 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:50
Re: Hypocrisy 599 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 569 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:49
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 551 cladking 29-Jun-16 03:48
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 640 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 05:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 513 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.