Merrell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Corpuscles Wrote:
>
> > > Can we expect to read your full "expert
> > analysis"
> > > and substantive supportive arguments for your
> > > conclusions?
> >
> > No. It would be far better if you carried out
> your
> > own analyses.
>
> But a crucial part of Scott Creighton's case
> relies upon the expertise of an "art expert," and
> not on the observations of the ordinary reader
> (who might be entirely ignorant of all the factors
> that have a bearing on such questions).

If you consider me to be an expert and take my word for it then feel free to do so.
The currency is in the type and level of expertise that has been explained and brought into this discussion by myself.
An "expert" bringing forth and applying "expertise" (brush stroke sequencing). If you will.
The "ordinary" reader, who I firmly believe is intelligent and fully capable of drawing their own conclusions, once they are made aware of the "expertise" by the "expert".
It isn't simply a case of it must be this way because Jon says so.
Stand up and think for yourself.

[www.youtube.com]



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Jun-16 08:42 by Jon Ellison.