Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Merrell Wrote:

> > > > You therefore have a specialist knowledge
> of
> > > > photography and art (as you've shown in
> some
> > > > previous posts): at any rate, more than the
> > > > average person.
> > >
> > > If you say so
> >
> > The point is that this is what Mr. Creighton
> says,
> > isn't it?
>
> Yes, he obviously agrees with you.

Whilst it would be a refreshing change for me and Scott to actually agree about anything :) , I would just make the point that it's not a case of him agreeing with me: it's a case of a statement having been made by him, and me subsequently seeking confirmation of that statement - not from him (as, sadly, he is not here at the moment), but from you, as you are obviously the best qualified person to do so in this context.

< snip - detailed technical arguments >

I'm not qualified to discuss or refute any of your technical points, I'm afraid. My point was that potential readers of GPH, however, would probably be engaging in such discussion during the months to come. And I'm sure they will also engage in consideration of, and discussion about, the other evidence for Scott's theories.